A PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF DESK AND PANEL CRIT SETTINGS IN THE DESIGN STUDIO

‘Desk Crit’ has been described as the most important critique setting for teaching design. This approach has been shown to be beneficial in providing different perspectives on design problems to students and bridging to professional practice. However, some issues may be envisaged in this style. In this paper, we try to address these issues by adopting a panel based critique setting named ‘Panel Crit’ in a second year product design studio. The ‘Panel Crit’ setting is then compared with the ‘Desk Crit’ setting through a questionnaire and a structured interview with 16 students. The survey protocol is based on an evaluation of teaching survey and consists of 12 close-ended and three open-ended questions. The protocol compares the critique styles across four dimensions: communication, learning, feedback and satisfaction. The preliminary results reveal the effectiveness of a panel-based critique in providing unambiguous feedback, avoiding multiple presentations and increasing time efficiency during studio sessions. However, our results confirm previous research findings which highlight the importance of ‘Desk Crit’ in conveying fundamental design skills, introducing students to design practice and showing practitioner’s approaches to design problems. We believe our findings could contribute to the understanding of how critique settings impact student’s learning experience in design studio.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1957 .

[2]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[3]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[4]  A. Oak.  It's a Nice Idea, but it's not actually Real: Assessing the Objects and Activities of Design , 2000 .

[5]  Belkis Uluoǧlu,et al.  Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques , 2000 .

[6]  Fritz Drury,et al.  Visualization Criticism , 2008, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  A. Ani,et al.  Reconstructing the Idea of Critique Session in Architecture Studio , 2011 .

[8]  Candy Carmel-Gilfilen,et al.  Where what’s in common mediates disciplinary diversity in design students: A shared pathway of intellectual development , 2012 .

[9]  Lorna Hamilton,et al.  Using Case Study in Education Research , 2012 .

[10]  Jonas Ivarsson,et al.  Embodied reasoning in architectural critique , 2012 .

[11]  Carol B. Brandt,et al.  The “right kind of telling”: knowledge building in the academic design studio , 2012 .

[12]  T. Schrand,et al.  Feedback practices and signature pedagogies: what can the liberal arts learn from the design critique? , 2012 .

[13]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios , 2013 .

[14]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment , 2013 .

[15]  Nangkula Utaberta,et al.  Upgrading Education Architecture by Redefining Critique Session in Design Studio , 2013 .