Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science.

PURPOSE As the science of team science evolves, the development of measures that assess important processes related to working in transdisciplinary teams is critical. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present the psychometric properties of scales measuring collaborative processes and transdisciplinary integration. METHODS Two hundred-sixteen researchers and research staff participating in the Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers (TTURC) Initiative completed the TTURC researcher survey. Confirmatory-factor analyses were used to verify the hypothesized factor structures. Descriptive data pertinent to these scales and their associations with other constructs were included to further examine the properties of the scales. RESULTS Overall, the hypothesized-factor structures, with some minor modifications, were validated. A total of four scales were developed, three to assess collaborative processes (satisfaction with the collaboration, impact of collaboration, trust and respect) and one to assess transdisciplinary integration. All scales were found to have adequate internal consistency (i.e., Cronbach alpha's were all >0.70); were correlated with intermediate markers of collaborations (e.g., the collaboration and transdisciplinary-integration scales were positively associated with the perception of a center's making good progress in creating new methods, new science and models, and new interventions); and showed some ability to detect group differences. CONCLUSIONS This paper provides valid tools that can be utilized to examine the underlying processes of team science--an important step toward advancing the science of team science.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[2]  A. Marks Rescuing the NIH before it is too late. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[3]  Daniel Stokols,et al.  Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research , 2006, American journal of community psychology.

[4]  José Esparza,et al.  The discovery value of “Big Science” , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  Stephen E. Marcus,et al.  The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives , 2008 .

[6]  C. Huxham Creating Collaborative Advantage , 1997 .

[7]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[8]  Robert Kramer,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1990 .

[9]  N. Anderson,et al.  Expanding the boundaries of health and social science : case studies in interdisciplinary innovation , 2003 .

[10]  P. Rosenfield,et al.  The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[11]  N. Anderson,et al.  Comprar Interdisciplinary Research Case studies from health and social science | Frank Kessel | 9780195324273 | Oxford University Press , 2008 .

[12]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? , 1996 .

[13]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[14]  R. Mermelstein,et al.  Transdisciplinary tobacco use research. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[15]  D. Stokols,et al.  In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration Lessons learned and implications for active living research. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  Kara L. Hall,et al.  The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  D. Rhoten,et al.  Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path , 2004, Science.

[18]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[19]  Kara L Hall,et al.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  H W Marsh,et al.  Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  B. Gray Cross-Sectoral Partners: Collaborative Alliances among Business, Government and Communities , 1996 .

[22]  Gerald Weissmann,et al.  Roadmaps, translational research, and childish curiosity , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  J. Klein Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  N. Anderson,et al.  Interdisciplinary research : case studies from health and social science , 2008 .

[25]  M. Clark,et al.  Evaluating transdisciplinary science. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.