How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers?

References are an essential component of research articles and therefore of scientific communication. In this study we investigate referencing (citing) behavior in five diverse fields (astronomy, mathematics, robotics, ecology and economics) based on 213,756 core journal articles. At the macro level we find: (a) a steady increase in the number of references per article over the period studied (50 years), which in some fields is due to a higher rate of usage, while in others reflects longer articles and (b) an increase in all fields in the fraction of older, foundational references since the 1980s, with no obvious change in citing patterns associated with the introduction of the Internet. At the meso level we explore current (2006–2010) referencing behavior of different categories of authors (21,562 total) within each field, based on their academic age, productivity and collaborative practices. Contrary to some previous findings and expectations we find that senior researchers use references at the same rate as their junior colleagues, with similar rates of re-citation (use of same references in multiple papers). High Modified Price Index (MPI, which measures the speed of the research front more accurately than the traditional Price Index) of senior authors indicates that their research has the similar cutting-edge aspect as that of their younger colleagues. In all fields both the productive researchers and especially those who collaborate more use a significantly lower fraction of foundational references and have much higher MPI and lower re-citation rates, i.e., they are the ones pushing the research front regardless of researcher age. This paper introduces improved bibliometric methods to measure the speed of the research front, disambiguate lead authors in co-authored papers and decouple measures of productivity and collaboration.

[1]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Y. Gingras,et al.  The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns , 2008, PloS one.

[3]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Henry Small Referencing through history: how the analysis of landmark scholarly texts can inform citation theory , 2010 .

[5]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .

[6]  B. Allen,et al.  Persuasive Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of References in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665-1990 , 1994, Social studies of science.

[7]  David Minguillo,et al.  Toward a new way of mapping scientific fields: Authors' competence for publishing in scholarly journals , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[9]  Leo Egghe,et al.  A model showing the increase in time of the average and median reference age and the decrease in time of the Price Index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[10]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[11]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Age, aging, and age structure in science , 1968 .

[12]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[13]  G. Gilbert Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[14]  Elizabeth Aversa,et al.  The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield , 2001 .

[15]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Maurice B. Line,et al.  THE ‘HALF‐LIFE’ OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE: APPARENT AND REAL OBSOLESCENCE , 1970 .

[17]  R. E. Burton,et al.  The “half‐life” of some scientific and technical literatures , 1960 .

[18]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[19]  Wiley Interscience Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 2013 .

[20]  B. Cronin,et al.  The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield , 2000 .

[21]  K. Brner Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know , 2010 .

[22]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Impact of the internet and scholar age distribution on academic citation age , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Modes of collaboration in modern science: Beyond power laws and preferential attachment , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  D. Price Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[25]  P. Wouters The citation culture , 1999 .

[26]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place , 2002, Scientometrics.

[27]  Howard D. White,et al.  Authors as citers over time , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  Effects of academic experience and prestige on researchers' citing behavior , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[30]  Thomas Wohlgemuth,et al.  Trend words in ecological core journals over the last 25 years (1978–2002) , 2004 .

[31]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  On Growth, Ageing, and Fractal Differentiation of Science , 2000, Scientometrics.

[32]  Alexander Zahar,et al.  Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science , 1991, Medical History.

[33]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  E‐prints and journal articles in astronomy: a productive co‐existence , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[34]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2002, J. Documentation.

[35]  Gaines H. Liner Core Journals in Economics , 2002 .

[36]  Ian Hacking,et al.  A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. , 1995 .

[37]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors , 1998, J. Documentation.

[38]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[39]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[40]  Norman M Kaplan,et al.  The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote , 1965 .

[41]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Power law distributions in information science: Making the case for logarithmic binning , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  Kun Lu,et al.  Who are the research disciples of an author? Examining publication recitation and oeuvre citation exhaustivity , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Between Texts and Contexts: Advances in Theories of Citation? (A Rejoinder) , 1999 .

[44]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[45]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Between texts and contexts: Advances in theories of citation? (A rejoinder) , 1999, Scientometrics.

[46]  Carnot E. Nelson,et al.  Communication among scientists and engineers , 1970 .

[47]  Diane Rasmussen Neal,et al.  Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  S. Shapin A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England , 1994 .

[49]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Need for a Theory of citing , 1981, J. Documentation.

[50]  Steven A Greenberg,et al.  How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[51]  S. Joy,et al.  What Should I Be Doing, and Where Are They Doing It? Scholarly Productivity of Academic Psychologists , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.