Eyeblink conditioning during an interstimulus interval switch in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) using picrotoxin to disrupt cerebellar cortical input to the interpositus nucleus.

The role of the cerebellar cortex in eyeblink classical conditioning remains unclear. Experimental manipulations that disrupt the normal function impair learning to various degrees, and task parameters may be important factors in determining the severity of impairment. This study examined the role of cerebellar cortex in eyeblink conditioning under conditioned stimulus?unconditioned stimulus intervals known to be optimal or nonoptimal for learning. Using infusions of picrotoxin to the interpositus nucleus of the rabbit cerebellum, the authors pharmacologically disrupted input from the cerebellar cortex while training with an interstimulus interval (ISI)-switch procedure. One group of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) was 1st trained with a 250-ms ISI (optimal) and then switched to a 750-ms ISI (nonoptimal). A 2nd group was trained in the opposite order. The most striking effect was that picrotoxin-treated rabbits initially trained with a 250-ms ISI learned comparably to controls, but those initially trained with a 750-ms ISI were severely impaired. These results suggest that functional input from cerebellar cortex becomes increasingly important for the interpositus nucleus to learn delay eyeblink conditioning as the ISI departs from an optimal interval.

[1]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  N. Donegan,et al.  A model of Pavlovian eyelid conditioning based on the synaptic organization of the cerebellum. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[3]  M. Mauk,et al.  Learning-Induced Plasticity in Deep Cerebellar Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Häusser,et al.  Tonic Synaptic Inhibition Modulates Neuronal Output Pattern and Spatiotemporal Synaptic Integration , 1997, Neuron.

[5]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Timing of conditioned responses utilizing electrical stimulation in the region of the interpositus nucleus as a CS , 2004, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[6]  D. Woodruff-Pak,et al.  Effects of paradigm and inter-stimulus interval on age differences in eyeblink classical conditioning in rabbits. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[7]  Boneau Ca The interstimulus interval and the latency of the conditioned eyelid response. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals , 1963 .

[9]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Norman Learning and Memory , 1982 .

[11]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  M. Mauk,et al.  Pharmacological analysis of cerebellar contributions to the timing and expression of conditioned eyelid responses , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[13]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. , 1984, Science.

[14]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  W. R. Mcallister Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  C. Yeo,et al.  Acquisition of a new-latency conditioned nictitating membrane response--major, but not complete, dependence on the ipsilateral cerebellum. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[17]  M. Stanton,et al.  The ontogeny of interstimulus interval (ISI) discrimination of the conditioned eyeblink response in rats. , 2006, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention. , 2003, Learning & memory.

[19]  J. Freeman,et al.  Purkinje cell loss by OX7-saporin impairs acquisition and extinction of eyeblink conditioning. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[20]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity related to the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  V. Bracha,et al.  GABA neurotransmission in the cerebellar interposed nuclei: involvement in classically conditioned eyeblinks and neuronal activity. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  S. I. Levin,et al.  Inactivation of sodium channel Scn8A (Na-sub(v)1.6) in Purkinje neurons impairs learning in Morris water maze and delay but not trace eyeblink classical conditioning. , 2006, Behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  J. Theios,et al.  Effect of CS-US interval shift on classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane in the rabbit. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain. , 1993, Science.

[25]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Long-term storage of an associative memory trace in the cerebellum. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  Joseph E. Steinmetz,et al.  Hippocampal lesions in rats differentially affect long- and short-trace eyeblink conditioning , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[28]  David G. Lavond,et al.  Trace conditioning: Abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations , 1985, Brain Research.

[29]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar Cortex Lesions Prevent Acquisition of Conditioned Eyelid Responses , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  O. Larsell,et al.  The comparative anatomy and histology of the cerebellum , 1967 .

[31]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Nictitating Membrane: Classical Conditioning and Extinction in the Albino Rabbit , 1962, Science.

[32]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar anterior lobe after rabbit eyeblink conditioning. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[33]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[34]  S. Kotani,et al.  Purkinje cell activity during learning a new timing in classical eyeblink conditioning , 2003, Brain Research.

[35]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[36]  M. Mauk,et al.  A Mechanism for Savings in the Cerebellum , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Effects of increasing the interstimulus interval during classical conditioning of the albino rabbit. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  C. Yeo,et al.  Acquisition of Eyeblink Conditioning Is Critically Dependent on Normal Function in Cerebellar Cortical Lobule HVI , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Magnus Ivarsson,et al.  Cerebellar Mechanisms in Eyeblink Conditioning , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[40]  M. Mauk,et al.  Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of cerebellar cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Mauk,et al.  Latent Acquisition of Timed Responses in Cerebellar Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  M. M. Patterson,et al.  Sensory preconditioning in the rabbit following ACTH injections , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[43]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Changes in Rabbit Cerebellar Cortical and Interpositus Nucleus Activity during Acquisition, Extinction, and Backward Classical Eyelid Conditioning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[44]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Acquisition and Extinction of the Classically Conditioned Eyelid Response in the Albino Rabbit , 1962, Science.

[45]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Effect of the interstimulus (CS-UCS) interval on hippocampal unit activity during classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). , 1980, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[46]  M. M. Patterson,et al.  Differential effects of hippocampectomy on classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response related to interstimulus interval. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[47]  S. Bao,et al.  Impaired classical eyeblink conditioning in cerebellar-lesioned and Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  J. Madden,et al.  Cerebellar GABAergic processes: evidence for critical involvement in a form of simple associative learning in the rabbit. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[50]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[51]  C. Yeo,et al.  Cerebellar Cortical AMPA–Kainate Receptor Blockade Prevents Performance of Classically Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Responses , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  G. A. Clark,et al.  Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses , 1984, Brain Research.

[53]  N. Schneiderman Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. , 1966 .