Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories

A short history of the major features of neutral theories of molecular evolution is presented. Emphasis is placed on the nearly neutral theory, as this version of the neutral theory has explained the widest range of phenomena. The shift of interest from protein to DNA evolution is chronicled, leading to the modern view that silent and replacement substitutions are responding to different evolutionary forces. However, the exact nature and magnitude of these forces remains controversial, as all current theoretical models suffer either from assumptions that are not quite realistic or from an inability to account readily for all phenomena. Although the gathering of sequence data has been the main effort of contemporary population genetics, further exploration of theoretical models of molecular evolution would provide a more coherent framework for data analysis.

[1]  T. Ohta.  Further examples of evolution by gene duplication revealed through DNA sequence comparisons. , 1994, Genetics.

[2]  J. Gillespie.  Substitution processes in molecular evolution. III. Deleterious alleles. , 1994, Genetics.

[3]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. , 1994, Genetics.

[4]  J. Gillespie.  SUBSTITUTION PROCESSES IN MOLECULAR EVOLUTION. II. EXCHANGEABLE MODELS FROM POPULATION GENETICS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  M. Nachman,et al.  Nonneutral evolution at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 gene in mice. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. Ohta.  An examination of the generation-time effect on molecular evolution. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Y. Iwasa.  Overdispersed molecular evolution in constant environments. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  W. Eanes,et al.  Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Gillespie,et al.  Substitution processes in molecular evolution. I. Uniform and clustered substitutions in a haploid model. , 1993, Genetics.

[10]  M. Long,et al.  Natural selection and the origin of jingwei, a chimeric processed functional gene in Drosophila. , 1993, Science.

[11]  C. Aquadro.  Why is the genome variable? Insights from Drosophila. , 1992, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  M. Bulmer.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[13]  D. Mindell.  Fundamentals of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[14]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila , 1991, Nature.

[15]  H. Tachida.  A study on a nearly neutral mutation model in finite populations. , 1991, Genetics.

[16]  T. Ohta,et al.  Theoretical study of near neutrality. I. Heterozygosity and rate of mutant substitution. , 1990, Genetics.

[17]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Estimating the variability of substitution rates. , 1989, Genetics.

[18]  J H Gillespie,et al.  Lineage effects and the index of dispersion of molecular evolution. , 1989, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  F. Tajima.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. , 1989, Genetics.

[20]  C. Aquadro,et al.  The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence. , 1988, Genetics.

[21]  N. Takahata.  More on the episodic clock. , 1988, Genetics.

[22]  J. Gillespie.  More on the overdispersed molecular clock. , 1988, Genetics.

[23]  R. Hudson,et al.  A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. , 1987, Genetics.

[24]  N. Takahata,et al.  On the overdispersed molecular clock. , 1987, Genetics.

[25]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  M. Nei.  Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[27]  J H Gillespie,et al.  The molecular clock may be an episodic clock. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Gillespie.  MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OVER THE MUTATIONAL LANDSCAPE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  M. Kimura,et al.  Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Nei,et al.  Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution , 1981, Nature.

[31]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Manolo Gouy,et al.  Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity , 1981, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  M. Gouy,et al.  Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  J. Kingman.  A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation , 1978, Journal of Applied Probability.

[35]  G. A. Watterson.  The homozygosity test of neutrality. , 1978, Genetics.

[36]  M. Kimura.  Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution , 1977, Nature.

[37]  N. Takahata,et al.  Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Nei,et al.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  J. Crow.  The genetic basis of evolutionary change , 1975 .

[40]  T. Ohta,et al.  On some principles governing molecular evolution. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  T. Ohta.  Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution , 1973, Nature.

[42]  F. Ayala,et al.  Enzyme Variability in the Drosophila willistoni GroupVIII. Genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation between two subspecies , 1973 .

[43]  J. Powell,et al.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila Willistoni group. V. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila equinoxialis. , 1972, Genetical research.

[44]  G. R. Fraser,et al.  The mathematics of heredity , 1971 .

[45]  T. Ohta,et al.  Protein Polymorphism as a Phase of Molecular Evolution , 1971, Nature.

[46]  D. Kohne.  Evolution of higher-organism DNA , 1970, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[47]  C. Laird,et al.  Rate of Fixation of Nucleotide Substitutions in Evolution , 1969, Nature.

[48]  M. Kimura,et al.  The rate of molecular evolution considered from the standpoint of population genetics. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. L. King,et al.  Non-Darwinian evolution. , 1969, Science.

[50]  M. Kimura.  Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level , 1968, Nature.

[51]  J. Crow,et al.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. , 1964, Genetics.

[52]  E. Freese.  On the evolution of the base composition of DNA , 1962 .

[53]  N. Sueoka.  On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition. , 1962, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  C. Anfinsen.  The Molecular Basis of Evolution , 1959, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[55]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[56]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Substitutions in Mammalian Genes: Intragenic Correlations , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[57]  C. Aquadro.  Molecular Population Genetics of Drosophila , 1993 .

[58]  J. Gillespie.  The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[59]  T. Miyata,et al.  Rapidly evolving mouse alpha-globin-related pseudo gene and its evolutionary history. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change , 2022 .

[61]  J. Powell,et al.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. , 1972, Genetics.

[62]  M. Kimura.  Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles. , 1968, Genetical research.

[63]  L. Pauling,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins , 1965 .

[64]  G. Malécot,et al.  The mathematics of heredity , 1948 .

[65]  G. Malécot,et al.  Les mathématiques de l'hérédité , 1948 .

[66]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.