Penguins, Camels, and Other Birds of a Feather: Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities

What types of human and social capital identify the emergence of leaders of open innovation communities? Consistent with the norms of an engineering culture, we find that future leaders must first make strong technical contributions. Beyond technical contributions, they must then integrate their communities in order to mobilize volunteers and avoid the ever-present danger of forking and balkanization. This is enabled by two correlated but distinct social positions: social brokerage and boundary spanning between technological areas. An inherent lack of trust associated with brokerage positions can be overcome through physical interaction. Boundary spanners do not suffer this handicap and are much more likely than brokers to advance to leadership. The research separates the influence of human and social capital on promotion, and highlights previously unexamined differences between brokerage-and boundary-spanning positions. Longitudinal analyses of careers within the Internet Engineering Task Force community from 1986--2002 support the arguments.

[1]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[2]  M. Schreurs.  From the Bottom Up , 2008 .

[3]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[4]  James Bessen.  Open Source Software , 2006 .

[5]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Selection Bias and Continuous‐Time Duration Models: Consequences and a Proposed Solution , 2006 .

[6]  Sarah Kaines,et al.  Gene transfer to plants by diverse species of bacteria , 2005, Nature.

[7]  Jean-Michel Dalle,et al.  The Allocation of Software Development Resources In ‘Open Source’ Production Mode , 2005 .

[8]  Elwyn B. Davies,et al.  IETF Problem Resolution Process , 2004, RFC.

[9]  Elwyn B. Davies.  IETF Problem Statement , 2004, RFC.

[10]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  Managing the Boundary of an 'Open' Project , 2004 .

[11]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2004 .

[12]  Trisha Gura.  Joining a Trend, Scientists Increasingly Say 'Call My Agent' , 2004, Science.

[13]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Free to Be Trusted? Organizational Constraints on Trust in Boundary Spanners , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[16]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[18]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking , 2002 .

[19]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[20]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments , 2002 .

[21]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[22]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[23]  Paul E. Hoffman,et al.  Defining the IETF , 2002, RFC.

[24]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[25]  Susan R. Harris,et al.  The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force , 2001, RFC.

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation , 2001 .

[27]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[29]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks , 2001 .

[30]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[31]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[32]  M. Needleman.  The Internet Engineering Task Force , 2000 .

[33]  P. Salus.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[34]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[35]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[36]  Chris DiBona,et al.  Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution , 1999 .

[37]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[38]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[39]  W. Aspray,et al.  Inventing the internet , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[40]  Scott O. Bradner,et al.  The Internet Standards Process - Revision 3 , 1996, RFC.

[41]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  B. Briscoe.  Internet Engineering Task Force , 1995 .

[43]  James B. Wade.  Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market , 1995 .

[44]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Nonlinear errors in variables Estimation of some Engel curves , 1995 .

[45]  David A. Jaeger,et al.  Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak , 1995 .

[46]  Erik Huizer,et al.  IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures , 1994, RFC.

[47]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  宋河重.  Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents : The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan , 1992 .

[49]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[50]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[51]  Roger V. Gould.  MULTIPLE NETWORKS AND MOBILIZATION IN THE PARIS COMMUNE, 1871* , 1991 .

[52]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[53]  V. Rich.  Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[54]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  R. Friedrich.  In Defense of Multiplicative Terms In Multiple Regression Equations , 1982 .

[56]  David A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model , 1982 .

[57]  Roger J. Bowden,et al.  A Comparative Study of Instrumental Variables Estimators for Nonlinear Simultaneous Models , 1981 .

[58]  W. Greene.  Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment , 1981 .

[59]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[60]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[61]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[62]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1973 .

[63]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[64]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[65]  Jay W. Lorsch.  Product innovation and organization , 1965 .