Abdominal Wall Closure in Emergency Laparotomy: Management and Outcome in Omdurman Teaching Hospital

Background: T h e incisions those applied in approaching those operations , were vertical anterior abdominal incisions (midline or paramedian), and the way these incisions were closed, it was either mass or layered abdominal wall closure and types of suture materials used in the closure, non - absorbable/absorbable, monofilament (Nylon)/ polyfilament (Vicryl). Objectives: T o stu dy a series of patients those who underwent vertical incisions, either midline or paramedian and how t hey were closed, mass or layered closure and suture materials used inclosing the abdomen and the outcome. Patients and methods: This study is an observational prospective analytical hospital based study. Conducted at Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Sudan, over one year duration from 2012 Sep to 2013 Sep. Included were patients who underwent vertical anterior abdominal incisions (midline or paramedian) for emergency laparotomy, Non probability sampling including patients consecutively. Questionnaires were used a nd the variables were; demographical patient data, indications for laparotomy, suture materials used in these closures, technique of closing the fascial layer and skin and the outcome. Patient consent and ethical clearance were obtained in advance. Data wa s analyzed using SPSS version 20 and the P value was considered significant if 㴀 0.05. Patients and methods: R e sults: 114 ( 91.9% ) patients underwent midline incisions and 10(8.1%) patients were paramedian incision. Mass closure were111 (89.5%) and layered were13 (10.5%) patients, types of suture materials used in the closure technique were non - absorbable polyamide (Nylon) 103(83.1%). Delayed absorbable polygactin 910 (Vicryl) 21 (19.9%). Sutures size used 2# (106) Nylon 90 (87.4%) Vicryl 16 (76.2%), 1# (17) Nylon 12 (11.7%) - vicryl 5(23.8%) and only one 0# (0.8%). Length of hospital stay 5days and less 55 (44.4%) patients, >5 - 10 days 52 (41.9%) patients and >10 days were 16 (13.7%) p

[1]  M. Schilling,et al.  Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures. , 2012, Surgery.

[2]  S. Chawla A comparison between mass closure and layered closure of midline abdominal incisions , 2012 .

[3]  Markus W. Büchler,et al.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy—a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079] , 2011, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[4]  A. A. Talpur,et al.  Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material. , 2011, Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC.

[5]  R. Thambudorai,et al.  An ideal suture for midline abdominal closure? , 2009, The Indian journal of surgery.

[6]  H. Stöltzing,et al.  Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery – Is there any consensus? , 2009, BMC surgery.

[7]  G. Pascual,et al.  Midline abdominal wall closure: a new prophylactic mesh concept. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  M. Bolli,et al.  [Incision and closure of the abdominal wall]. , 2006, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[9]  J. Rucinski,et al.  Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. , 2005, Current surgery.

[10]  J. M. Bellón-Caneiro [Abdominal wall closure in laparotomy]. , 2005, Cirugia espanola.

[11]  M. Carlson [New developments in abdominal wall closure]. , 2000, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[12]  R. Malthaner,et al.  The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[13]  M. Hohl,et al.  Modern synthetic suture materials and abdominal wound closure techniques in gynaecological surgery. , 1987, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  R H Kennedy,et al.  Abdominal wound closure: a controlled trial of polyamide (nylon) and polydioxanone suture (PDS). , 1985, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.