Sensitivity-based dynamic control frequency scheduling of quadcopter MAVs

Micro aerial vehicles (MAVs), in particular, quadcopters, have seen increasing adoption in many application domains due to their flexible operations and versatile functions. By taking advantages of the inherent system inertia properties of the physical platform during MAV operations, satisfactory flight performance of the vehicle can be achieved despite a variety of internal and external disturbances including environment perturbations and cyber-physical attacks, provided the fault detection and control strategy is maintained with a proper lower bound of its operating frequency. From the control design perspective, such frequency bound depends heavily on the sensitivity of the system response to its dynamic properties including inertia and dynamic couplings. For a cyber-physical system, which is subject to various cyber and physical attacks, there is usually a large sensitivity difference between physical time scale and cyber time scale. With this fact, a properly designed fault-tolerant and control strategy can leverage the inertia property of the system to arrive at an optimal control frequency to save computational power while maintaining the flight performance. For many current MAVs, their control programs are usually executed at a fixed high-frequency, which provides no significant performance gains at most of the time. In this work, we perform a sensitivity analysis and quantification of the vehicle system to guide the design and optimization of customized on-board control and computational resources. By quantifying system sensitivity and its variation across different control channels (DOFs), the computational resources can be re-distributed and optimized to detect and reject cyber-physical attacks more efficiently. With the proposed method, the cyber and physical resources of the vehicle can be allocated by system demands, which can further enhance vehicle reliability and accomplish complicated security tasks. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we have conducted the simulated flight test with the real vehicle parameters.

[1]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems , 1986 .

[2]  W.J. Rugh Analytical framework for gain scheduling , 1991, IEEE Control Systems.

[3]  K. Åström,et al.  Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[4]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Event-Triggered Real-Time Scheduling of Stabilizing Control Tasks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  An introduction to event-triggered and self-triggered control , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[6]  N. Marchand,et al.  Event-triggered nonlinear control for attitude stabilization of a quadrotor , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[7]  Marek Miskowicz,et al.  Event-based sampling strategies in networked control systems , 2014, 2014 10th IEEE Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS 2014).

[8]  Edgar R. Weippl,et al.  Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2018, CCS.

[9]  Justin M. Bradley,et al.  Co-Regulation of Computational and Physical Effectors in a Quadrotor Unmanned Aircraft System , 2018, 2018 ACM/IEEE 9th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS).

[10]  Xinyan Deng,et al.  Cross-Layer Retrofitting of UAVs Against Cyber-Physical Attacks , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[11]  Xinyan Deng,et al.  Flappy Hummingbird: An Open Source Dynamic Simulation of Flapping Wing Robots and Animals , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[12]  J. Sukarno Mertoguno,et al.  A physics‐based strategy for cyber resilience of CPS , 2019, Defense + Commercial Sensing.