Removing Visual Bias in Filament Identification: A New Goodness-of-fit Measure

Different combinations of input parameters to filament identification algorithms, such as Disperse and FilFinder, produce numerous different output skeletons. The skeletons are a one pixel wide representation of the filamentary structure in the original input image. However, these output skeletons may not necessarily be a good representation of that structure. Furthermore, a given skeleton may not be as good a representation as another. Previously there has been no mathematical `goodness-of-fit' measure to compare output skeletons to the input image. Thus far this has been assessed visually, introducing visual bias. We propose the application of the mean structural similarity index (MSSIM) as a mathematical goodness-of-fit measure. We describe the use of the MSSIM to find the output skeletons most mathematically similar to the original input image (the optimum, or `best', skeletons) for a given algorithm, and independently of the algorithm. This measure makes possible systematic parameter studies, aimed at finding the subset of input parameter values returning optimum skeletons. It can also be applied to the output of non-skeleton based filament identification algorithms, such as the Hessian matrix method. The MSSIM removes the need to visually examine thousands of output skeletons, and eliminates the visual bias, subjectivity, and limited reproducibility inherent in that process, representing a major improvement on existing techniques. Importantly, it also allows further automation in the post-processing of output skeletons, which is crucial in this era of `big data'.

[1]  Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al.  scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.

[2]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[3]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Structural Similarity Quality Metrics in a Coding Context: Exploring the Space of Realistic Distortions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  N. Peretto,et al.  Herschel view of the Taurus B211/3 filament and striations: evidence of filamentary growth? , 2012, 1211.6360.

[5]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV , 1995 .

[6]  Astrophysics,et al.  UNVEILING A NETWORK OF PARALLEL FILAMENTS IN THE INFRARED DARK CLOUD G14.225−0.506 , 2012, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  Enzo Pascale,et al.  BALLOON-BORNE SUBMILLIMETER POLARIMETRY OF THE VELA C MOLECULAR CLOUD: SYSTEMATIC DEPENDENCE OF POLARIZATION FRACTION ON COLUMN DENSITY AND LOCAL POLARIZATION-ANGLE DISPERSION , 2015, 1509.05298.

[8]  Prasanth H. Nair,et al.  Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.

[9]  P. Andre',et al.  Filamentary structure and magnetic field orientation in Musca , 2016 .

[10]  E. Schisano,et al.  THE IDENTIFICATION OF FILAMENTS ON FAR-INFRARED AND SUBMILLIMITER IMAGES: MORPHOLOGY, PHYSICAL CONDITIONS AND RELATION WITH STAR FORMATION OF FILAMENTARY STRUCTURE , 2014, 1406.4443.

[11]  E. Rosolowsky,et al.  Filament Identification through Mathematical Morphology , 2015, 1507.02289.

[12]  P. Goldsmith,et al.  13CO filaments in the Taurus molecular cloud , 2014, 1408.4809.

[13]  T. Sousbie The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure I: Theory and implementation , 2010, 1009.4015.

[14]  Qizhou Zhang,et al.  DISCOVERY OF AN EXTREMELY WIDE-ANGLE BIPOLAR OUTFLOW IN AFGL 5142 , 2016, 1604.03548.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Annie Zavagno,et al.  Filaments and ridges in Vela C revealed by Herschel: from low-mass to high-mass star-forming sites , 2011, 1108.0941.

[17]  S. Ott,et al.  Herschel Space Observatory - An ESA facility for far-infrared and submillimetre astronomy , 2010, 1005.5331.