A landscape and landscape biography approach to assessing the consequences of an environmental policy implementation

ABSTRACT Assessing outcomes of agri-environmental policy implementations is complex. Traditional parametric methods such as using key indicators can miss outcomes that are displaced in time and space, seldom account for the integrated nature of social and biophysical dynamics, and may overlook unintended consequences. This project aimed to overcome these drawbacks by using a landscape biography approach to analyse an innovative agri-environmental policy experiment around Lake Taupo, New Zealand. Landscape biographies were developed for each of three embedded cases, analysed as socio-ecological systems focused on relationships at different spatial scales. Landscape development paths were identified and a future trajectory estimated. The multiscale approach revealed unforeseen consequences of the policy regime, enabled a more comprehensive portrayal of social and landscape outcomes, and made complex interactions and processes understandable and accessible.

[1]  Simon Swaffield,et al.  Science for action at the local landscape scale , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  D. Mitchell.  New Axioms for Reading the Landscape: Paying Attention to Political Economy and Social Justice , 2008 .

[3]  A. M. Hersperger,et al.  Driving forces of landscape change - current and new directions , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  B. B. Walters.  Explaining rural land use change and reforestation: A causal-historical approach , 2017 .

[5]  Per Mickwitz,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Environmental Policy Instruments Context and Key Concepts , 2003 .

[6]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Theory in evaluation: Reducing confusion and encouraging debate , 2015 .

[7]  M. Lefebvre,et al.  Sustainability of European winter wheat- and maize-based cropping systems: Economic, environmental and social ex-post assessment of conventional and IPM-based systems , 2017 .

[8]  O. Bina,et al.  New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research , 2004 .

[9]  O. Aldred.  Landscape Biographies: Geographical, Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on the Production and Transmission of Landscapes , 2016 .

[10]  Tim Rayner,et al.  The evaluation of climate policy: theory and emerging practice in Europe , 2011 .

[11]  S. Lee,et al.  The effect of the rural tourism policy on non-farm income in South Korea , 2015 .

[12]  P. Verburg.  The Representation of Human-Environment Interactions in Land Change Research and Modelling , 2014 .

[13]  C. Conte.  The forest becomes desert: forest use and environmental change in Tanzania's West Usambara mountains , 1999 .

[14]  J. Rotmans,et al.  Transitions in a Globalising World , 2005 .

[15]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: evidence from policy evaluation studies , 2010 .

[16]  A. Jordan,et al.  Environmental policy evaluation in the EU: between learning, accountability, and political opportunities? , 2019, Environmental Politics.

[17]  Laurence Le Dû-Blayo,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS): Knowledge for Sustainable Stewardship of Social-ecological Systems Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: recent progress in European landscape research , 2015 .

[18]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy , 2009 .

[19]  F. Gerritsen,et al.  Landscape Biography as Research Strategy: The Case of the South Netherlands Project , 2009 .

[20]  I. Darnhofer,et al.  Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[21]  M. Scriven.  The methodology of evaluation , 1966 .

[22]  Graham Fairclough,et al.  Lens, mirror, window: interactions between Historic Landscape Characterisation and Landscape Character Assessment , 2016 .

[23]  M. Torres García.  Landscape biographies: geographical, historical, and archaeological perspectives on the production and transmission of landscapes , 2016 .

[24]  M. Elen Deming,et al.  Landscape architecture research : inquiry, strategy, design , 2011 .

[25]  Tim Rayner,et al.  Climate policy innovation: developing an evaluation perspective , 2014 .

[26]  L. Gray.  Is land being degraded? A multi-scale investigation of landscape change in southwestern Burkina Faso , 1999 .

[27]  Christina A. Christie.  What Guides Evaluation? A Study of How Evaluation Practice Maps onto Evaluation Theory , 2003 .

[28]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  A portfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions:Institutions and land change , 2006 .

[29]  A. Valk.  Preservation and Development: The Cultural Landscape and Heritage Paradox in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[30]  Tony Petch,et al.  PROTECTING AN ICON MANAGING SOURCES OF DIFFUSE NUTRIENT INFLOW TO LAKE TAUPO , NEW ZEALAND , 2003 .

[31]  P. Selman,et al.  Landscape as a Focus for Integrating Human and Environmental Processes , 2006 .

[32]  James S. Shortle,et al.  Economics and Environmental Markets: Lessons from Water-Quality Trading , 2013, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[33]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe , 2015 .

[34]  J. Lyytimäki,et al.  Russian Dolls and Chinese Whispers: Two Perspectives on the Unintended Effects of Sustainability Indicator Communication , 2014 .

[35]  Comparing Water Quality Trading Programs: What Lessons Are There To Learn? , 2012 .

[36]  Craig S. Revels.  Placing Managua: a landscape narrative in post-earthquake Nicaragua , 2014 .

[37]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamics of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Tropical Regions , 2003 .

[38]  D. Huitema,et al.  Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects , 2014 .

[39]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[40]  A. Spicer,et al.  Assessing the consequences of the Lake Taupo Nitrogen Trading Programme in New Zealand, using a landscape approach , 2017 .

[41]  Steven Shuttleworth,et al.  Landscape research and knowledge exchange: learning from the HERCULES research project , 2017 .

[42]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective , 2007 .

[43]  Stijn Smismans,et al.  Policy Evaluation in the EU: The Challenges of Linking Ex Ante and Ex Post Appraisal , 2015, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[44]  Tun Myint.  Democracy in Global Environmental Governance: Issues, Interests, and Actors in the Mekong and the Rhine , 2003 .

[45]  Carole L. Crumley,et al.  Studying long-term changes in cultural landscapes: outlines of a research framework and protocol , 2017 .

[46]  S. Thalberg.  Navigating Social Ecological Systems Building Resilience For Complexity And Change , 2016 .

[47]  S. Shuttleworth.  Editorial annex: key findings and recommendations from the HERCULES research project, and the need for a landscape approach to enviromental governance , 2017 .

[48]  M. Lapka,et al.  Changing Landscapes, Changing Landscape's Story , 2003 .

[49]  Ken P. Yocom.  Building Watershed Narratives: An Approach for Broadening the Scope of Success in Urban Stream Restoration , 2014 .

[50]  Per Mickwitz,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Environmental Policy Instruments , 2003 .

[51]  Richard R. Marcus,et al.  Historical perspectives on contemporary human–environment dynamics in southeast Africa , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  Carole L. Crumley.  Historical ecology and the study of landscape , 2017 .

[53]  J. B. Jackson,et al.  The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays , 1979 .