Demonstration of decentralised wastewater recycling in urban villages in Western Australia

Decentralised wastewater recycling and irrigation demonstration projects were established in three urban villages located within the Perth Metropolitan Region, to determine whether decentralised systems can achieve equal public health and environmental standards, and improved sustainability outcomes at comparable costs to centralised systems. The trial sites were located at Bridgewater Lifestyle Village, a development of 389 home sites, with lot scale greywater recycling; Timbers Edge Residential Village, a development of 260 homes, with a central greywater recycling system; and Banksia Tourist Park, a caravan park comprising 76 permanent park homes and 95 caravan bays, with the potential for a central wastewater recycling system. A review of current regulations, legislation, existing water modelling concepts, and existing wastewater decision tools highlighted the need for both a new water modelling concept and a new wastewater model appropriate for urban villages. This paper focuses on monitoring conducted at the Bridgewater Lifestyle Village trial site, which showed that environmental and sustainability considerations favour decentralised systems, with the economic and public health outcomes being similar. The real test for cost effectiveness will be the community's choice of whether to retain the decentralised system in preference to connecting to a centralised system when the option becomes available. Social acceptance of small scale systems requires the test of time, and urban villages considered in this study, which incorporate sustainability features into their design, will assist to overcome the stigma associated with wastewater reuse. However, a change to regulations and policies is required to recognise village and cluster scale systems that have centralised management, to encourage developers to implement these sustainable features into their plans.

[1]  Kuruvilla Mathew,et al.  Constructed wetlands for domestic greywater treatment in urban villages , 2008 .

[2]  Martin Anda,et al.  Centralised versus decentralized wastewater systems in an urban context: the sustainability dimension , 2004 .

[3]  C. Evans Greywater reuse: An assessment of the scheme water savings that can be achieved at a household scale , 2009 .

[4]  Martin Anda,et al.  Appropriate technology selection tool for decentralised wastewater treatment systems , 2008 .

[5]  Kuruvilla Mathew,et al.  Integrated Urban Water Management: Water Environmental Technologies at the Cluster Scale , 2005 .

[6]  Martin Anda,et al.  Bridgewater lifestyle village: A case study in innovative urban water management , 2007 .

[7]  Kuruvilla Mathew,et al.  Investigation of decentralised wastewater recycling for irrigation of public open space in urban villages: Development of a model for reliable management systems and improved protection of public health and the environment within the Perth Metropolitan Region , 2007 .

[8]  Martin Anda,et al.  Decentralised wastewater treatment and recycling systems: The new management team approach. , 2008 .

[9]  Martin Anda,et al.  Tools to progress small water and wastewater systems , 2008 .

[10]  Martin Anda,et al.  Wastewater Treatment and Recycling in Urban Villages: Implementation and Policy Issues for Western Australia , 2007 .

[11]  D Hellström,et al.  Evaluation of small wastewater treatment systems. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.