Social context rapidly modulates the influence of auditory feedback on avian vocal motor control.

Sensory feedback is important for the learning and control of a variety of behaviors. Vocal motor production in songbirds is a powerful model system to study sensory influences on behavior because the learning, maintenance, and control of song are critically dependent on auditory feedback. Based on previous behavioral and neural experiments, it has been hypothesized that songs produced in isolation [undirected (UD) song] represent a form of vocal practice, whereas songs produced to females during courtship interactions [female-directed (FD) song] represent a form of vocal performance. According to this "practice versus performance" framework, auditory feedback should be more influential when birds engage in vocal practice than when they engage in vocal performance. To directly test this hypothesis, we used a computerized system to perturb auditory feedback at precise locations during the songs of Bengalese finches and compared the degree to which feedback perturbations caused song interruptions as well as changes to the sequencing and timing of syllables between interleaved renditions of UD and FD song. We found that feedback perturbation caused fewer song interruptions and smaller changes to syllable timing during FD song than during UD song. These data show that changes in the social context in which song is produced rapidly modulate the influence of auditory feedback on song control in a manner consistent with the practice versus performance framework. More generally, they indicate that, for song, as for other motor skills including human speech, the influence of sensory feedback on activity within vocal premotor circuitry can be dynamically modulated.

[1]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  The Role of Auditory Feedback in Birdsong , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  F. Goller,et al.  Respiratory units of motor production and song imitation in the zebra finch. , 2002, Journal of neurobiology.

[3]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Early onset of deafening‐induced song deterioration and differential requirements of the pallial‐basal ganglia vocal pathway , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  M. Fee,et al.  Using temperature to analyze temporal dynamics in the songbird motor pathway , 2008, Nature.

[5]  J. C. Fentress,et al.  Deafferentation does not disrupt natural rules of action syntax , 1987, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  What songbirds teach us about learning , 2002, Nature.

[7]  P Howell,et al.  Susceptibility to the effects of delayed auditory feedback , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Keir G Pearson,et al.  Generating the walking gait: role of sensory feedback. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[9]  H. Williams,et al.  Testosterone decreases the potential for song plasticity in adult male zebra finches , 2003, Hormones and Behavior.

[10]  P Howell,et al.  Delayed auditory feedback with delayed sounds varying in duration , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  T W Troyer,et al.  An associational model of birdsong sensorimotor learning I. Efference copy and the learning of song syllables. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Konishi The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. , 1965, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[13]  Sarah J. Alger,et al.  Neuroanatomical evidence for indirect connections between the medial preoptic nucleus and the song control system: possible neural substrates for sexually motivated song , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[14]  P. Mitra,et al.  How sleep affects the developmental learning of bird song , 2005, Nature.

[15]  Philippe Absil,et al.  Identification of the origin of catecholaminergic inputs to HVc in canaries by retrograde tract tracing combined with tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry , 2000, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[16]  B. Wyke Laryngeal neuromuscular control systems in singing. A review of current concepts. , 1974, Folia phoniatrica.

[17]  I. Bharati,et al.  Fos responses of dopamine neurons to sociosexual stimuli in male zebra finches , 2006, Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Lane,et al.  Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Anthony Leonardo,et al.  Experimental test of the birdsong error-correction model. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R. Mooney,et al.  Development of Intrinsic and Synaptic Properties in a Forebrain Nucleus Essential to Avian Song Learning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  D. G. MacKay Metamorphosis of a critical interval: age-linked changes in the delay in auditory feedback that produces maximal disruption of speech. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  The Activation of Birdsong by Testosterone , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  Cory T. Miller,et al.  Interruptibility of long call production in tamarins: implications for vocal control , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  A. Doupe,et al.  Contributions of an avian basal ganglia–forebrain circuit to real-time modulation of song , 2005, Nature.

[26]  C. Harding,et al.  Changes in catecholamine levels and turnover rates in hypothalamic, vocal control, and auditory nuclei in male zebra finches during development. , 1998, Journal of neurobiology.

[27]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Noradrenergic Inputs Mediate State Dependence of Auditory Responses in the Avian Song System , 2022 .

[28]  S. White,et al.  FoxP2 Regulation during Undirected Singing in Adult Songbirds , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  H. Sakaguchi,et al.  Cholinergic innervation of the song control nuclei by the ventral paleostriatum in the zebra finch: a double-labeling study with retrograde fluorescent tracers and choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry , 1997, Brain Research.

[30]  Sarah M. N. Woolley,et al.  Bengalese Finches Lonchura Striata Domestica Depend upon Auditory Feedback for the Maintenance of Adult Song , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Fos-like immunoreactivity in catecholaminergic brain nuclei after territorial behavior in free-living song sparrows. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[33]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  J. W. Aldridge,et al.  Sequential super-stereotypy of an instinctive fixed action pattern in hyper-dopaminergic mutant mice: a model of obsessive compulsive disorder and Tourette's , 2005, BMC Biology.

[35]  J. van Borsel,et al.  Speech disruption under delayed auditory feedback in multilingual speakers. , 2005, Journal of fluency disorders.

[36]  R. Mooney Synaptic Mechanisms for Auditory‐Vocal Integration and the Correction of Vocal Errors , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Georg B. Keller,et al.  Rapid Interhemispheric Switching during Vocal Production in a Songbird , 2008, PLoS biology.

[38]  R. Sossinka,et al.  Song Types in the Zebra Finch Poephila guttata castanotis1 , 1980 .

[39]  Katharina Riebel,et al.  Light Flash Stimulation Alters the Nightingale's Singing Style: Implications for Song Control Mechanisms , 1997 .

[40]  K. Berridge Substantia nigra 6-OHDA lesions mimic striatopallidal disruption of syntactic grooming chains: A neural systems analysis of sequence control , 1989, Psychobiology.

[41]  Georg B. Keller,et al.  Neural processing of auditory feedback during vocal practice in a songbird , 2009, Nature.

[42]  J. Doyon,et al.  Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  K. Berridge,et al.  Super‐stereotypy II: Enhancement of a complex movement sequence by intraventricular dopamine D1 agonists , 2000, Synapse.

[45]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[46]  E.C.L. Vu,et al.  Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[47]  G. J. Borden An interpretation of research on feedback interruption in speech , 1979, Brain and Language.

[48]  K Okanoya,et al.  Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[49]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Online Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Neural Activity in Avian Song Control Circuitry , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Allison J. Doupe,et al.  Neurons in a Forebrain Nucleus Required for Vocal Plasticity Rapidly Switch between Precise Firing and Variable Bursting Depending on Social Context , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Gerald E. Hough,et al.  Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[52]  R. Cowie,et al.  Postlingually Acquired Deafness: Speech Deterioration and the Wider Consequences , 1992 .

[53]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[54]  Richard Hans Robert Hahnloser,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Vocal Sequence Generation in the Songbird , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[55]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[56]  M. Smotherman,et al.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[57]  J. Sakata,et al.  Real-Time Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Avian Vocal Motor Control , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  N. Hessler,et al.  Role of the midbrain dopaminergic system in modulation of vocal brain activation by social context , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[59]  E. Nordeen,et al.  Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[60]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vocal Experimentation in the Juvenile Songbird Requires a Basal Ganglia Circuit , 2005, PLoS biology.

[61]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Context-dependent song amplitude control in Bengalese finches , 2003, Neuroreport.

[62]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  3 3 A Computational Model of Avian Song Learning , 2000 .

[63]  S. Bottjer,et al.  Development of Topography within Song Control Circuitry of Zebra Finches during the Sensitive Period for Song Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  R J Dooling,et al.  Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  The planning and control of reaching movements , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[66]  T. Sotnikova,et al.  Social Context-Dependent Singing-Regulated Dopamine , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  Michael S Brainard,et al.  Lesions of an avian basal ganglia circuit prevent context-dependent changes to song variability. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  Bernard S. Lee Effects of delayed speech feedback , 1950 .

[69]  Michael S Brainard,et al.  An avian basal ganglia-forebrain circuit contributes differentially to syllable versus sequence variability of adult Bengalese finch song. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  Stephen D. Shea,et al.  Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Modulation of Auditory Activity in the Zebra Finch Song System , 2003, Neuron.

[71]  M. Fee,et al.  Singing-related activity of identified HVC neurons in the zebra finch. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  Franz Goller,et al.  Somatosensory feedback modulates the respiratory motor program of crystallized birdsong , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  D Margoliash,et al.  Behavioral state modulation of auditory activity in a vocal motor system. , 1998, Science.

[74]  C. Cate,et al.  Dove coos and flashed lights: Interruptibility of "song" in a nonsongbird. , 1996 .

[75]  J. Cynx,et al.  Immediate and transitory effects of delayed auditory feedback on bird song production , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[77]  J. F. Prather,et al.  Precise auditory–vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication , 2008, Nature.

[78]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[79]  Allison J Doupe,et al.  Social Context–Induced Song Variation Affects Female Behavior and Gene Expression , 2008, PLoS biology.

[80]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. , 1998, Science.

[81]  D. Morris The Reproductive Behaviour of the Zebra Finch (Poephila Guttata), With Special Reference To Pseudofemale Behaviour and Displacement Activities , 1954 .

[82]  J. Pratt,et al.  Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[83]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  A role for norepinephrine in the regulation of context‐dependent ZENK expression in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[84]  Peter Howell,et al.  Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[85]  N. Hessler,et al.  Modulation of singing‐related activity in the songbird ventral tegmental area by social context , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[86]  Charlotte A. Boettiger,et al.  Developmentally Restricted Synaptic Plasticity in a Songbird Nucleus Required for Song Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[87]  K. Berridge,et al.  Action sequencing is impaired in D1A‐deficient mutant mice , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[88]  Robin C. Ashmore,et al.  Brainstem and Forebrain Contributions to the Generation of Learned Motor Behaviors for Song , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[89]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Noradrenergic projections to the song control nucleus area X of the medial striatum in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[90]  K. Okanoya,et al.  Song Motor control organizes acoustic patterns on two levels in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[91]  P. Slater,et al.  SONG ORGANISATION AND SINGING PATTERNS OF THE WILLOW WARBLER, PHYLLOSCOPUS TROCHILUS , 2000 .

[92]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback , 1999, Nature.

[93]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[94]  R. Zann The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies , 1996 .

[95]  J. Cynx Experimental determination of a unit of song production in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[96]  K. D. Punta,et al.  An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird , 2002 .

[97]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[98]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  For Whom The Bird Sings Context-Dependent Gene Expression , 1998, Neuron.

[99]  A. Doupe,et al.  Interruption of a basal ganglia–forebrain circuit prevents plasticity of learned vocalizations , 2000, Nature.

[100]  C. Harding,et al.  Central DSP-4 treatment decreases norepinephrine levels and courtship behavior in male zebra finches , 1996, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[101]  P. Howell,et al.  Strength of German accent under altered auditory feedback , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[102]  A. Doupe,et al.  Social context modulates singing-related neural activity in the songbird forebrain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[103]  J. Sakata,et al.  Social modulation of sequence and syllable variability in adult birdsong. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[104]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Neuronal coding of prediction errors. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[105]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Age at Deafening Affects the Stability of Learned Song in Adult Male Zebra Finches , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[106]  A. C. Yu,et al.  Temporal Hierarchical Control of Singing in Birds , 1996, Science.

[107]  M S Brainard,et al.  Postlearning Consolidation of Birdsong: Stabilizing Effects of Age and Anterior Forebrain Lesions , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[108]  Philip H. Price Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. , 1979 .

[109]  L. Cosmides From : The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1995 .

[110]  P. Slater,et al.  Animals can vary signal amplitude with receiver distance: evidence from zebra finch song , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[111]  E. Nordeen,et al.  LMAN lesions prevent song degradation after deafening without reducing HVC neuron addition , 2007, Developmental neurobiology.

[112]  Toru Shimizu,et al.  Development of the catecholaminergic innervation of the song system of the male zebra finch. , 1996, Journal of neurobiology.

[113]  S. Sober,et al.  Adult birdsong is actively maintained by error correction , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[114]  M. Brainard Contributions of the Anterior Forebrain Pathway to Vocal Plasticity , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.