Dead wood creation to compensate for habitat loss from intensive forestry

Negative consequences of human activities for biodiversity may be mitigated by compensation measures. Although the interest in applying compensation measures is generally increasing, such measures have rarely been applied in forestry. Many boreal forests are managed by clear felling and used for timber and pulp production. There is an increasing interest in intensifying forestry by also harvesting slash and stumps for biofuel at felling. We evaluated the efficiency of combining intensified forestry production with compensation measures, by estimating the net revenue from slash and stump harvest, the cost of high stump creation, and simulating habitat amount for 680 bark- and wood-living species (fungi, beetles, lichens, and bryophytes) in Norway spruce forests in Sweden under different scenarios of biofuel harvest and compensation. We show that the harvest of slash and stumps has a clear negative effect on the habitat amount available for many species, especially for many fungi and beetles. Combining slash harvesting with the creation of high stumps results in an economic surplus and at the same time provides significantly more habitat in comparison with no slash harvesting and no high stump creation. When undertaking stump harvesting it is currently impossible to achieve such positive effects. Thus, our analyses show that compensation can sometimes be a useful tool when both economic and biodiversity goals must be achieved in forestry, but in other cases it is a better alternative to avoid the activity that causes the negative effects.

[1]  Mats Jonsell,et al.  Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity - a review focused on the situation in Europe. , 2012 .

[2]  E. Arnett,et al.  Experimental effects of structural enrichment on avian nest survival , 2012 .

[3]  M. Jonsson,et al.  Cost efficiency of measures to increase the amount of coarse woody debris in managed Norway spruce forests , 2005 .

[4]  J. Rolstad,et al.  Time since death and fall of Norway spruce logs in old-growth and selectively cut boreal forest , 2002 .

[5]  S. Larsson,et al.  Spatial occurrence of a habitat-tracking saproxylic beetle inhabiting a managed forest landscape. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  B. Šket,et al.  Reserve selection for conserving groundwater biodiversity , 2009 .

[7]  B. Nordén,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of silvicultural measures to increase substrate availability for red-listed wood-living organisms in Norway spruce forests , 2006 .

[8]  M. Jonsell,et al.  Logs and stumps in clearcuts support similar saproxylic beetle diversity: implications for bioenergy harvest. , 2011 .

[9]  G. Thor,et al.  Modelled impact of Norway spruce logging residue extraction on biodiversity in Sweden , 2011 .

[10]  M. Jonsell Saproxylic beetle species in logging residues: which are they and which residues do they use? , 2008 .

[11]  J. Siitonen,et al.  Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland , 2004 .

[12]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[13]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Nitrogen productivity of some conifers , 1983 .

[14]  F. Hieke Freude, H., Harde, K. W., & Lohse, G. A.: Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Band 7, Clavicornia. — Krefeld (Verlag Goecke u. Evers) 1967; 310 S., mit zahlreichen Abb. im Text; DM 48,— , 1968 .

[15]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks , 2010, Environmental management.

[16]  Charles Smith,et al.  Environmental factors in woodfuel production: Opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices , 2009 .

[17]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Productivity of Stump Harvesting for Fuel , 2008 .

[18]  A. Asikainen,et al.  Metsähakkeen hankinta- ja toimituslogistiikan haasteet ja kehittämistarpeet , 2011 .

[19]  Bengt A. Olsson,et al.  Decomposition and nutrient release from Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus sylvestris L. logging residues , 2000 .

[20]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies , 2012 .

[21]  T. Ranta,et al.  Logging residues from regeneration fellings for biofuel production - a GIS-based availability and supply cost analysis , 2002 .

[22]  B. Czech,et al.  Prospects for Reconciling the Conflict between Economic Growth and Biodiversity Conservation with Technological Progress , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  A. Nordin,et al.  Lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi of Fennoscandia , 2004 .

[24]  G. Ståhl,et al.  Functions for below-ground biomass of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden , 2006 .

[25]  Jason T Quigley,et al.  Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: A Field Audit of Habitat Compensation Projects , 2006, Environmental management.

[26]  T. Ahti,et al.  Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe , 1968 .

[27]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland , 2000 .

[28]  I. Vanha-Majamaa,et al.  Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[29]  Å. Lindelöw,et al.  Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles , 2004 .

[30]  M. Jonsell,et al.  Felled or standing retained wood: it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles , 2003 .

[31]  E. Arnett,et al.  Landscape composition influences avian colonization of experimentally created snags , 2012 .

[32]  J. Andersson,et al.  Saproxylic beetle assemblages on low stumps, high stumps and logs: implications for environmental effects of stump harvesting. , 2010 .

[33]  I. Vanha-Majamaa,et al.  Stump decomposition rates after clear-felling with and without prescribed burning in southern and northern boreal forests in Finland , 2012 .

[34]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Effects of forest-fuel harvesting on the amount of deadwood on clear-cuts , 2005 .

[35]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy , 2005 .

[36]  P. Anttila,et al.  Are the Finnish targets for the energy use of forest chips realistic - Assessment with a spatial market model , 2011 .

[37]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[38]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[39]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral , 2012 .

[40]  L. M. Schroeder,et al.  Importance of habitat patch size for occupancy and density of aspen-associated saproxylic beetles , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[41]  B. Jonsson,et al.  Modelling dead wood in Norway spruce stands subject to different management regimes , 2003 .

[42]  BougetChristophe,et al.  Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity — a review focused on the situation in Europe11This article is one of a selection of papers from the International Symposium on Dynamics and Ecological Services of Deadwood in Forest Ecosystems. , 2012 .

[43]  A. Laurén,et al.  Whole-tree harvesting with stump removal versus stem-only harvesting in peatlands when water quality, biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation matter , 2014 .

[44]  G. Thor,et al.  Lichen species diversity and substrate amounts in young planted boreal forests: A comparison between slash and stumps of Picea abies , 2008 .

[45]  R. T. Brooks,et al.  Ecological impacts of energy-wood harvests: lessons from whole-tree harvesting and natural disturbance , 2013 .

[46]  K. Alexander,et al.  European Red List of saproxylic beetles , 2010 .

[47]  B. Klausnitzer,et al.  Die Käfer Mitteleuropas , 2012 .

[48]  A. M. Hersperger,et al.  How much compensation do we need? Replacement ratio estimates for Swiss dry grassland biotopes , 2010 .

[49]  Simon J. Grove,et al.  Coarse woody debris, biodiversity and management: a review with particular reference to Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests , 2003 .