Age and Planning Tasks: The Influence of Ecological Validity

Planning ability is important in many everyday tasks, such as cooking and shopping. Previous studies have investigated aging effects on planning, looking at either widely used laboratory-based neuropsychological tasks such as the Tower of London (TOL) or more naturalistic planning tasks, such as organizing shopping errands. In the current study, we compare the effects of normal adult aging on both the TOL and a more ecologically valid planning task, the Plan-a-Day (PAD) task. There was a reliable decline in TOL planning performance with age, but no significant correlation between age and PAD planning performance. Age-related variance was partly explained by variance in information processing speed and education. It is proposed that in more ecologically valid planning tasks, age changes in processing speed can be compensated for by task-related knowledge. Implications for everyday planning performance by older adults are considered.

[1]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[2]  L. Phillips,et al.  Age, working memory, and the Tower of London task , 2003 .

[3]  John R. Crawford,et al.  The Executive Decline Hypothesis of Cognitive Aging: Do Executive Deficits Qualify as Differential Deficits and Do They Mediate Age-Related Memory Decline? , 2000 .

[4]  S. Czaja,et al.  Practically relevant research: capturing real world tasks, environments, and outcomes. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[5]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Planning Processes and Age in the Five-disc Tower of London Task , 1999 .

[6]  M. Lachman,et al.  Planning and Control Processes Across the Life Span: An Overview , 1993 .

[7]  R. Morris,et al.  The Cognitive Psychology of Planning , 2004 .

[8]  S. Salloway,et al.  Prediction of Functional Status from Neuropsychological Tests in Community-Dwelling Elderly Individuals , 2000, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[9]  J. Funke,et al.  Plan-a-Day: Konzeption eines modifizierbaren Instruments zur Führungskräfte-Auswahl sowie erste empirische Befunde , 1995 .

[10]  L Hasher,et al.  Age and inhibition. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Age-related differences in supervisory attentional system functions. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[12]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Planning , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  K. Hattori,et al.  Development of Diagnostic Guideline of Intelligence Evaluation for People with Disabilities by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised ( WAIS-R ) , 1992 .

[14]  L. Phillips,et al.  Mental planning and the Tower of London task , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Midlife aging, open-ended planning, and laboratory measures of executive function. , 2001, Neuropsychology.

[16]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[17]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[18]  T. Shallice.  Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  P. Baltes,et al.  Selective optimization with compensation: Life-span perspectives on successful human development , 1995 .

[20]  Mike Martin,et al.  Attention and Planning in Older Adults , 1997 .

[21]  E. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank,et al.  Memory impairment suggests hippocampal dysfunction in abstinent ecstasy users , 2003, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  J. Jolles,et al.  Stroop interference: aging effects assessed with the Stroop Color-Word Test. , 1993, Experimental aging research.