Self-recognition generates characteristic responses in pupil dynamics and microsaccade rate

Visual fixation is an active process with pupil dynamics as well as fixational eye movements and microsaccades that support perception. Measures of both pupil contraction and microsaccades are known to be sensitive to ongoing cognition and emotional processing. Here we present experimental results from a visual fixation task demonstrating that pupil size and microsaccade rate respond differently during self-recognition (when seeing one's own face) than when seeing familiar or unfamiliar faces. First, the pupil response is characterized by an immediate pupil-constriction followed by later dilation in response to stimulus onsets. For one's own face, we observe muted constriction and greater dilation compared to other faces. Second, microsaccades, which generally show an inhibitory response to incoming stimuli, are more strongly inhibited in response to one's own face compared to other faces. Our results lend support to the idea that eye-related physiological measures could contribute to biometric identification procedures.

[1]  S. Mathôt,et al.  Methods in cognitive pupillometry: Design, preprocessing, and statistical analysis , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  A. Huckauf,et al.  Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process , 2020, Journal of cognition.

[3]  B. Laeng,et al.  Pupillometry , 2020, Definitions.

[4]  R. Kliegl,et al.  How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial , 2018, Journal of Memory and Language.

[5]  J. Waters,et al.  Neuromodulatory Correlates of Pupil Dilation , 2018, Front. Neural Circuits.

[6]  S. Mathôt.  Pupillometry: Psychology, Physiology, and Function , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[7]  Tobias Otto,et al.  What our eyes tell us about feelings: Tracking pupillary responses during emotion regulation processes. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[8]  E. Donchin,et al.  ERP and pupil responses to deviance in an oddball paradigm. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[9]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[10]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[11]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Control of fixation duration during scene viewing by interaction of foveal and peripheral processing. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[12]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Computational Modeling of Collicular Integration of Perceptual Responses and Attention in Microsaccades , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Rolfs.  Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way , 2009, Vision Research.

[14]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[15]  M. Bradley,et al.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[16]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Turatto,et al.  Visual oddballs induce prolonged microsaccadic inhibition , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Linden.  The P300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us? , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Henderson.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Rainer,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Sparks.  The brainstem control of saccadic eye movements , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Kok.  On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[26]  J. Schall,et al.  Saccade target selection in frontal eye field of macaque. I. Visual and premovement activation , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[28]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and the Depth-of-field of the Human Eye as Measured by Laser Speckle , 1977 .

[29]  Barbara J. Winterson,et al.  Microsaccades during finely guided visuomotor tasks , 1976, Vision Research.

[30]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[32]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[33]  Ralf Engbert.  Dynamical Models In Neurocognitive Psychology , 2021 .

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  J. Polich.  Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[36]  Ralf Engbert.  Microsaccades: A microcosm for research on oculomotor control, attention, and visual perception. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[37]  L. Stark,et al.  The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements , 1975 .

[38]  J. Sullivan.  Flick-induced Flips in Perception , 2022 .