Evaluation of Envisat MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index-Based Models for the Estimation of Terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity

This letter evaluates three Envisat Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (MTCI)-based models for the estimation of terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) across a range of vegetation types. Correlations between flux tower measures of GPP and models for years between 2003 and 2007 were established for 30 sites across USA, Canada, and Brazil. Correlations were seen to range from very strong to weak, depending on seasonal variation in photosynthetic capacity (which is influenced by chlorophyll content) exhibited by the vegetation at each site. At least one of the three models obtained a statistically significant relationship with GPP at every site. Results indicate that chlorophyll content (as measured by the MTCI) is a most relevant community property for estimating primary productivity and chlorophyll-related vegetation indexes provide favorable approximations of the GPP of terrestrial vegetation. The inclusion of radiation information (photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR)) into the models extended the applicability of the models and the accuracy of the GPP estimate. Although further investigation is required to fully understand the applicability of these models and their parameters, these results point to the possibility of a total remote sensing approach to GPP estimation.

[1]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Tracking plant physiological properties from multi-angular tower-based remote sensing , 2011, Oecologia.

[2]  Paul J. Curran,et al.  Global composites of the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index , 2007 .

[3]  Harold Hotelling.  Golden Oldies: Classic Articles from the World of Statistics and Probability: The Teaching of Statistics , 1988 .

[4]  Wenjiang Huang,et al.  Remote estimation of gross primary production in wheat using chlorophyll-related vegetation indices , 2009 .

[5]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Forest ecosystem chlorophyll content: Implications for remotely sensed estimates of net primary productivity , 2003 .

[6]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Comparison of three models for predicting gross primary production across and within forested ecoregions in the contiguous United States , 2009 .

[7]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Estimation of incident Photosynthetically Active Radiation from MODIS Data , 2006 .

[8]  T. A. Black,et al.  The use of remote sensing in light use efficiency based models of gross primary production: a review of current status and future requirements. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  R. Waring,et al.  The normalized difference vegetation index of small Douglas-fir canopies with varying chlorophyll concentrations , 1994 .

[10]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[12]  A. Vilches,et al.  Teaching of Statistics , 1940, Nature.

[13]  Jadunandan Dash,et al.  The potential of the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index for carbon flux estimation , 2010 .

[14]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  Patterns and controls of the variability of radiation use efficiency and primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems , 2010 .

[15]  T. A. Black,et al.  A MODIS-derived photochemical reflectance index to detect inter-annual variations in the photosynthetic light-use efficiency of a boreal deciduous forest , 2005 .

[16]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Estimation of absorbed PAR across Scandinavia from satellite measurements. Part II: Modeling and evaluating the fractional absorption , 2007 .

[17]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[18]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[19]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Scaling gross ecosystem production at Harvard Forest with remote sensing: a comparison of estimates from a constrained quantum‐use efficiency model and eddy correlation , 1995 .

[20]  A. Viña,et al.  Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity , 2006 .

[21]  Benjamin Poulter,et al.  Modeling the Sensitivity of the Seasonal Cycle of GPP to Dynamic LAI and Soil Depths in Tropical Rainforests , 2009, Ecosystems.

[22]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  A lidar-based hierarchical approach for assessing MODIS fPAR , 2008 .

[23]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  Phenology of vegetation in Southern England from Envisat MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI) data , 2011 .

[24]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Methods of Assessing Terrestrial Productivty , 1975 .

[25]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  REMOTE ESTIMATION OF GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN MAIZE , 2011 .

[26]  J. Monteith.  Light Distribution and Photosynthesis in Field Crops , 1965 .