Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within- versus between-subjects correlations.

Previous researchers using between-subjects comparisons have found eyewitness confidence and accuracy to be only negligibly correlated. In this study, we examined the predictive power of confidence in within-subject terms. Ninety-six subjects answered, and made confidence ratings for, a series of questions about a crime they witnessed. The average between-subjects and within-subject accuracy-confidence correlations were comparably low: r = .14 (p less than .001) and r = .17 (p less than .001), respectively. Confidence is neither a useful predictor of the accuracy of a particular witness nor of the accuracy of particular statements made by the same witness. Another possible predictor of accuracy, response latency, correlated only negligibly with accuracy (r = -.09 within subjects), but more strongly with confidence (r = -.27 within subjects). This pattern was obtained for both between-subjects and within-subject comparisons. The theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

[1]  J. Hart Methodological note on feeling-of-knowing experiments. , 1966, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  Kenneth A. Deffenbacher,et al.  Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. , 1987 .

[4]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  Eyewitness Identification: Retrospective Self-Awareness and the Accuracy-Confidence Correlation , 1985 .

[5]  M. Blake Prediction of recognition when recall fails: Exploring the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon , 1973 .

[6]  D. Schacter Feeling of knowing in episodic memory. , 1983 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Deffenbacher,et al.  Eyewitness accuracy and confidence , 1980 .

[8]  J. Brigham,et al.  Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitnes identifications , 1983 .

[9]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness testimony : psychological perspectives , 1984 .

[10]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the memory-monitoring process , 1967 .

[11]  Kenneth A. Deffenbacher,et al.  Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. , 1977 .

[12]  G. Stephenson,et al.  An experimental study of social performance and delay on the testimonial validity of story recall , 1983 .

[13]  E L Brown,et al.  Memory for faces: testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence. , 1981, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  J. Brigham,et al.  The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications , 1983 .

[15]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[16]  Meetings make evidence? An experimental study of collaborative and individual recall of a simulated police interrogation , 1986 .

[17]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[19]  K. Deffenbacher,et al.  Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? , 1982 .

[20]  A. Chapman,et al.  Psychology and law : topics from an international conference , 1984 .

[21]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments for Predicting Perceptual Identification and Relearning , 1984 .