E.coli DH5α cell response to a sudden change in microfluidic chemical environment

Motile bacteria respond to changing chemical environment by moving towards or away from a particular location. Bacterial migration under chemical gradient is one of the most studied areas in biomedical field. In this work we looked into how bacterial cells respond to sudden change in the microfluidic chemical environment. E.coli DH5α cells were subjected to an attractant gradient (0.1 mM sorbitol - attractant to E.coli cells) and after 120 min the same cells were exposed to an inhibitor (0.1 mM NiSO4) gradient in the same microfluidic device. Our studies revealed that when the E.coli DH5α cells were exposed to 0.1 mM sorbitol, they showed faster chemotaxis towards the attractant (0.1 mM sorbitol) and achieved steady state by 60 min. When we replaced 0.1 mM sorbitol with 0.1 mM NiSO4 in the device we found that that the E.coli DH5α cells started responding to change in chemical environment within 10 min and achieved steady state at the end of 60 min. This shows that the bacterial cells respond to change in local chemical environment is within few minutes.

[1]  Harry L. T. Mobley,et al.  Pathogenic Escherichia coli , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[2]  A. Weintraub Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli: epidemiology, virulence and detection. , 2007, Journal of medical microbiology.

[3]  Noo Li Jeon,et al.  Microfluidic Multicompartment Device for Neuroscience Research. , 2003, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Taesung Kim,et al.  Diffusion-based and long-range concentration gradients of multiple chemicals for bacterial chemotaxis assays. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  J. Stock,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis: The five sensors of a bacterium , 1998, Current Biology.

[6]  J. Adler,et al.  Chemoreceptors in bacteria. , 1969, Science.

[7]  J. Adler Chemotaxis in Bacteria , 1966, Science.

[8]  Albert Libchaber,et al.  A concentration-dependent switch in the bacterial response to temperature , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[9]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis in linear and nonlinear steady microfluidic gradients. , 2010, Nano letters.

[10]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[11]  M. Levine,et al.  Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea , 1988, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[12]  C. Tancrède Role of human microflora in health and disease , 1992, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[13]  S. Boyden THE CHEMOTACTIC EFFECT OF MIXTURES OF ANTIBODY AND ANTIGEN ON POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES , 1962, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Generation of Solution and Surface Gradients Using Microfluidic Systems , 2000 .

[15]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[16]  R. M. Ford,et al.  Measurement of bacterial random motility and chemotaxis coefficients: I. Stopped‐flow diffusion chamber assay , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  M. Shuler,et al.  A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  A microfluidic platform for studying the effects of small temperature gradients in an incubator environment. , 2008, Biomicrofluidics.

[19]  Turning to the cold , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  Mingming Wu,et al.  Responses of Escherichia coli Bacteria to Two Opposing Chemoattractant Gradients Depend on the Chemoreceptor Ratio , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  Mark E. Polinkovsky,et al.  Generation of oxygen gradients with arbitrary shapes in a microfluidic device. , 2010, Lab on a chip.