Automated target detection system for hyperspectral imaging sensors.

Over the past several years, hyperspectral sensor technology has evolved to the point where real-time processing for operational applications is achievable. Algorithms supporting such sensors must be fully automated and robust. Our approach, for target detection applications, is to select signatures from a target reflectance library database and project them to the at-sensor and collection-specific radiance domain using the weather forecast or radiosonde data. This enables platform-based detection immediately following data acquisition without the need for further atmospheric compensation. One advantage of this method for reflective hyperspectral sensors is the ability to predict the radiance signatures of targets under multiple illumination conditions. A three-phase approach is implemented, where the library generation and data acquisition phases provide the necessary input for the automated detection phase. In addition to employing the target detector itself, this final phase includes a series of automated filters, adaptive thresholding, and confidence assignments to extract the optimal information from the detection scores for each spectral class. Our prototype software is applied to 50 reflective hyperspectral datacubes to measure detection performance over a range of targets, backgrounds, and environmental conditions.

[1]  Wayne A. Morrissey The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) , 2002 .

[2]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Paul E. Lewis,et al.  FLAASH, a MODTRAN4-based atmospheric correction algorithm, its application and validation , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[4]  Edwin M. Winter,et al.  Compact Airborne Spectral Sensor (COMPASS) , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  James A. Gardner,et al.  MODTRAN4: radiative transfer modeling for remote sensing , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Christopher G. Simi,et al.  On-board processing for the COMPASS , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Alan D. Stocker,et al.  Real-time hyperspectral detection and cuing , 2000 .

[8]  David W. Warren,et al.  LWIR/MWIR imaging hyperspectral sensor for airborne and ground-based remote sensing , 1996, Optics & Photonics.

[9]  Bea Thai,et al.  Invariant subpixel material detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive subspace detectors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Robert W. Basedow,et al.  HYDICE system: implementation and performance , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[12]  Wallace M. Porter,et al.  The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1993 .

[13]  T. S. Spisz,et al.  Automated sizing of DNA fragments in atomic force microscope images , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  D. Roberts,et al.  Estimation of aerosol optical depth and additional atmospheric parameters for the calculation of apparent reflectance from radiance measured by the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer , 1993 .

[15]  Alan D. Stocker,et al.  Design and performance of the Civil Air Patrol ARCHER hyperspectral processing system , 2005 .

[16]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.