Contextual effects of small environments on the electric images of objects and their brain evoked responses in weakly electric fish

SUMMARY This article reports some contextual effects of fish hovering in small environments on active imaging. Foveal electrosensory images of objects and their corresponding evoked responses in the electrosensory lobe are altered in amplitude and waveform when the fish are inside tubes. The article describes: (i) the physical basis of the changes imposed by small environments on electric images, (ii) the field potential responses at the electrosensory lobe of chronically implanted animals when entering and leaving tubes, and (iii) the effect of context on object discrimination. Biophysical analysis indicates that tubes cause a change in the efficiency of a previously described pre-receptor/post-effector mechanism responsible for the electric `illumination' of nearby objects (as mirrors change the illumination of visual scenes). Field potential responses at the electrosensory lobe showed two components corresponding to the fast- and slow-electrosensory pathways respectively: (a) an early spike following the input without adaptation; (b) a series of waves lasting the rest of the cycle and exhibiting different degrees of adaptation. Discrimination experiments showed that fish react to changes in image rather than to changes in object resistance. The amplitude of the novelty responses evoked by similar changes in the total energy of electric images was constant despite the large change in basal stimulus amplitude and waveform caused by hovering in the tubes. These facts may be explained by the presence of adaptive responses observed at the slow pathway in the electrosensory lobe.

[1]  T. Szabo,et al.  An electrotonically coupled pathway in the central nervous system of some teleost fish, gymnotidae and mormyridae , 1975, Brain Research.

[2]  A. Caputi,et al.  Structural and functional aspects of the fast electrosensory pathway in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the pulse fish Gymnotus carapo , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  Caputi The electric organ discharge of pulse gymnotiforms: the transformation of a simple impulse into a complex spatio-temporal electromotor pattern , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  L. Maler,et al.  Neural architecture of the electrosensory lateral line lobe: adaptations for coincidence detection, a sensory searchlight and frequency-dependent adaptive filtering , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  J. Albert,et al.  New Species of Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes, Teleostei) from Southeastern Brazil: Toward the Deconstruction of Gymnotus carapo , 1999 .

[6]  H. W. Lissmann On the Function and Evolution of Electric Organs in Fish , 1958 .

[7]  K. Grant,et al.  The electric image in Gnathonemus petersii , 2002, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[8]  A. Caputi,et al.  Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: differences between self-generated and conspecific-generated signal carriers. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  Diego Rother,et al.  Electric images of two low resistance objects in weakly electric fish. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[10]  L. Maler,et al.  Plastic and Nonplastic Pyramidal Cells Perform Unique Roles in a Network Capable of Adaptive Redundancy Reduction , 2004, Neuron.

[11]  Angel A. Caputi,et al.  Contributions of electric fish to the understanding sensory processing by reafferent systems , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[12]  R. Lorente de Nó,et al.  A study of nerve physiology. , 1947, Studies from the Rockefeller institute for medical research. Reprints. Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.

[13]  A. Caputi,et al.  The spinal cord of Gymnotus carapo: the electromotoneurons and their projection patterns. , 1994, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[14]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[15]  O. Macadar,et al.  Innervation pattern and electric organ discharge waveform in Gymnotus carapo (Teleostei; Gymnotiformes). , 1984, Journal of neurobiology.

[16]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[17]  Angel A Caputi,et al.  Electrolocation and electrocommunication in pulse gymnotids: signal carriers, pre-receptor mechanisms and the electrosensory mosaic , 2002, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[18]  D. Bodznick,et al.  Adaptive mechanisms in the elasmobranch hindbrain , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  P. Moller Electric fishes : history and behavior , 1995 .

[20]  A. Caputi,et al.  Probability and amplitude of novelty responses as a function of the change in contrast of the reafferent image in G. carapo , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  A. Caputi,et al.  Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: pre-receptor processing and the distribution of electroreceptor types. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  L. Maler,et al.  The posterior lateral line lobe of certain gymnotoid fish: Quantitative light microscopy , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  Theodore H. Bullock,et al.  Evidence for a Category of Electroreceptors in the Lateral Line of Gymnotid Fishes , 1993 .

[24]  Joseph A. Edminister Schaum's outline of theory and problems of electric circuits , 1993 .

[25]  Theodore H. Bullock,et al.  Species Differences in Effect of Electroreceptor Input on Electric Organ Pacemakers and Other Aspects of Behavior in Electric Fish; pp. 102–118 , 1969 .