Early Top–Down Control of Visual Processing Predicts Working Memory Performance

Selective attention confers a behavioral benefit on both perceptual and working memory (WM) performance, often attributed to top–down modulation of sensory neural processing. However, the direct relationship between early activity modulation in sensory cortices during selective encoding and subsequent WM performance has not been established. To explore the influence of selective attention on WM recognition, we used electroencephalography to study the temporal dynamics of top–down modulation in a selective, delayed-recognition paradigm. Participants were presented with overlapped, “double-exposed” images of faces and natural scenes, and were instructed to either remember the face or the scene while simultaneously ignoring the other stimulus. Here, we present evidence that the degree to which participants modulate the early P100 (97–129 msec) event-related potential during selective stimulus encoding significantly correlates with their subsequent WM recognition. These results contribute to our evolving understanding of the mechanistic overlap between attention and memory.

[1]  S. Bentin,et al.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[3]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[5]  S. Luck,et al.  Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[6]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials , 2005, Vision Research.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  H L Hawkins,et al.  Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Shedden,et al.  Progressive N170 habituation to unattended repeated faces , 2006, Vision Research.

[11]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  Markers of preparatory attention predict visual short-term memory performance , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face processing stages: Impact of difficulty and the separation of effects , 2006, Brain Research.

[15]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Age-related differences during simple working memory decisions: ERP indices of early recognition and compensation failure , 2011, Brain Research.

[16]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  C. Lustig,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention , 2007 .

[18]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  A. Gazzaley.  Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Modulates Maintenance of Representations in Visual Short-term Memory , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Chun,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Learning-Related Repetition Attenuation Effects in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Switching Attention without Shifting the Spotlight: Object-Based Attentional Modulation of Brain Potentials , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Kartik K. Sreenivasan,et al.  Selective Attention Supports Working Memory Maintenance by Modulating Perceptual Processing of Distractors , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Mitchell Valdes-Sosa,et al.  Attentional shifts between surfaces: effects on detection and early brain potentials , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Control of object-based attention in human cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  The Role of Spatial Attention in the Selection of Real and Illusory Objects , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Ke Zhou,et al.  Cue Validity and Object-Based Attention , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[31]  Kartik K. Sreenivasan,et al.  Temporal Characteristics of Top-Down Modulations during Working Memory Maintenance: An Event-related Potential Study of the N170 Component , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Valia Rodríguez,et al.  Two-object attentional interference depends on attentional set. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[33]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[34]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is the face‐sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[35]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain , 2004, Nature.

[43]  A. Gazzaley,et al.  Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[44]  R. Simons,et al.  Multiple group membership influences face-recognition: Recall and neurological evidence , 2011 .

[45]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  R. K. Simpson.  Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[49]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Differential coupling of visual cortex with default network or frontal-parietal network based on goals , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[51]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Telling one face from another: Electrocortical correlates of facial characteristics among individual female faces , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding , 2007, Brain Research.

[53]  Joaquin A. Anguera,et al.  Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Unifying prefrontal cortex function: Executive control, neural networks, and top-down modulation. , 2007 .

[55]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[58]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[59]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of feature-based attention. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs) , 2004, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[62]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[63]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Does modulation of selective attention to features reflect enhancement or suppression of neural activity? , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[64]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  J. Desmond,et al.  Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. , 1998, Science.

[66]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[67]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[68]  S. Vinogradov,et al.  Cognitive Training for Impaired Neural Systems in Neuropsychiatric Illness , 2012, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[69]  A. Jha,et al.  Tracking the time-course of attentional involvement in spatial working memory: an event-related potential investigation. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[70]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Attentional control of the processing of neural and emotional stimuli. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[71]  J. Haxby,et al.  Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[73]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Objects Are Highlighted by Spatial Attention , 2006 .

[74]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[75]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.