Using nasal curves matching for expression robust 3D nose recognition

The development of 3D face recognition algorithms that are robust to variations in expression has been a challenge for researchers over the past decade. One approach to this problem is to utilize the most stable parts on the face surface. The nasal region's relatively constant structure over various expressions makes it attractive for robust recognition and, in this paper, the use of features from the three-dimensional shape of nose is evaluated. After denoising, face cropping and alignment, the nose region is cropped and 16 landmarks robustly detected on its surface. Pairs of landmarks are connected, which results in 75 curves on the nasal surface; these curves form the feature set. The most stable curves over different expressions and occlusions (due to glasses) are selected and used for nose recognition. The Bosphorus dataset is used for feature selection and FRGC v2.0 for nose recognition. Results show a rank-one recognition rate of 82.58% using only two training samples with varying expression for 505 different subjects and 4879 samples, and 90.87% and 81.61% using the FRGC v2.0 dataset Spring2003 folder for training and the Fall2003 and Spring2004 folders for testing, for neutral and varying expressions, respectively. Given the relatively low complexity of the features and matching, the varying expression results are encouraging.

[1]  Maurício Pamplona Segundo,et al.  Automatic Face Segmentation and Facial Landmark Detection in Range Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[2]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Face recognition: A literature survey , 2003, CSUR.

[3]  Mohammed Bennamoun,et al.  An Efficient Multimodal 2D-3D Hybrid Approach to Automatic Face Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Multiple Nose Region Matching for 3D Face Recognition under Varying Facial Expression , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Jun Guo,et al.  Extended SRC: Undersampled Face Recognition via Intraclass Variant Dictionary , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  The Photoface database , 2011, CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS.

[7]  Berk Gökberk,et al.  Nasal Region-Based 3D Face Recognition under Pose and Expression Variations , 2009, ICB.

[8]  Hassen Drira,et al.  Nasal Region Contribution in 3D Face Biometrics Using Shape Analysis Framework , 2009, ICB.

[9]  Adrian N. Evans,et al.  Self-dependent 3D face rotational alignment using the nose region , 2011, ICDP.

[10]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[12]  Rong Xiao,et al.  3D Face Recognition by Local Shape Difference Boosting , 2008, ECCV.

[13]  Jason Weston,et al.  Multi-Class Support Vector Machines , 1998 .

[14]  Vitomir Struc,et al.  The Complete Gabor-Fisher Classifier for Robust Face Recognition , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[15]  Arman Savran,et al.  Bosphorus Database for 3D Face Analysis , 2008, BIOID.

[16]  Jim Austin,et al.  A Machine-Learning Approach to Keypoint Detection and Landmarking on 3D Meshes , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Melvyn L. Smith,et al.  The nose on your face may not be so plain: Using the nose as a biometric , 2009, ICDP.

[18]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Overview of the face recognition grand challenge , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).