MITRE-Bedford: description of the ALEMBIC system as used for MUC-4

The ALEMBIC text understanding system fielded at MUC-4 by MITRE-Bedford is primarily based on natural language techniques. ALEMBIC is a research prototype that is intended to explore several major areas of investigation:• Error recovery, involving primarily issues of semi-parsing and recovery of plausible attachments.• Robustness, involving primarily issues of uncertain reasoning and tractable inference.• Self-extensibility, focusing primarily on machine learning of natural language and user-configurable semantics.• System integration, through SGML (the Standard Generalized Markup Language), both at the level of meaning analysis and at the overall application level.

[1]  Claire Cardie,et al.  University of Massachusetts: Description of the CIRCUS System as Used for MUC-4 , 1992, MUC.

[2]  Jerry R. Hobbs Ontological Promiscuity , 1985, ACL.

[3]  Kent Wittenburg,et al.  Predictive Combinators: a Method for Efficient Processing of Combinatory Categorial Grammars , 1987, ACL.

[4]  Samuel Bayer,et al.  The relation-based knowledge representation of King Kong , 1991, SGAR.

[5]  Beth Sundheim,et al.  Overview of the Third Message Understanding Evaluation and Conference , 1991, MUC.

[6]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English , 1985 .

[7]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps , 1987 .

[8]  Lisa F. Rau,et al.  GE: description of the NLTooLSET system as used for MUC-3 , 1991, MUC.

[9]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  FASTUS: A Finite-state Processor for Information Extraction from Real-world Text , 1993, IJCAI.

[10]  Ralph M. Weischedel,et al.  BBN PLUM: MUC-4 Test Results and Analysis , 1992, MUC.

[11]  David A. McAllester Ontic: A Knowledge Representation System for Mathematics , 1989, CADE.

[12]  Jan van Eijck,et al.  Logical Forms in the Core Language Engine , 1989, ACL.

[13]  John D. Burger,et al.  Probabilistic Resolution of Anaphoric Reference , 1992 .

[14]  Marc B. Vilain,et al.  Deduction as Parsing: Tractable Classification in the KL-ONE Framework , 1991, AAAI.

[15]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar , 1986, CSLI Lecture Notes.

[16]  Herbert Gish,et al.  BBN: Description of the PLUM System as Used for MUC-5 , 2005, MUC.

[17]  Mark Steedman,et al.  A Lazy way to Chart-Parse with Categorial Grammars , 1987, ACL.

[18]  Lisa F. Rau,et al.  Lexico-Semantic Pattern Matching as a Companion to Parsing in Text Understanding , 1991, HLT.

[19]  Ralph M. Weischedel,et al.  BBN: description of the PLUM system as used for MUC-3 , 1991, MUC.

[20]  Marc Vilain,et al.  Validation of Terminological Inference in an Information Extraction Task , 1993, HLT.

[21]  Charles F. Goldfarb,et al.  SGML handbook , 1990 .

[22]  Susann Luperfoy Discourse pegs: a computational analysis of context-dependent referring expressions , 1992 .

[23]  Jerry R. Hobbs The Generic Information Extraction System , 1993, MUC.