Game theory based interactive demand side management responding to dynamic pricing in price-based demand response of smart grids

Abstract Bidirectional interaction between power grid and buildings is a key characteristic of smart grids. Achieving a win-win situation for a grid and buildings with such interactions remains a challenge. Game theory is a powerful tool for using strategic analysis to identify the best interactions between multiple players. Stackelberg game can effectively reflect the core status of grid and the auxiliary position of buildings in this interaction (particularly in demand response programs), but no study used this game to establish such interactions while simultaneously considering the multiple requirements of grid and buildings, particularly for the commercial sector. In this study, therefore, basic and enhanced interaction strategies between a grid and buildings are developed using the Stackelberg game based on their identified Nash equilibria. The grid optimizes the price to maximize its net profit and reduce demand fluctuation, and individual building optimizes the hourly power demand to minimize electricity bill and effects of demand alternation from the baseline. In addition, the effects of building demand baseline uncertainty on the interaction are investigated and the enhanced robust interaction is proposed to deal with such uncertainty. Real site data of buildings on a campus in Hong Kong are used to validate the proposed interaction strategies. The results show that the proposed basic interaction increased net profit by 8% and reduced demand fluctuation by about 40% for the grid, with savings in electricity bills of 2.5–8.3% for the buildings. Moreover, the proposed robust interaction effectively relieved the negative effects caused by prediction uncertainty.

[1]  Xiao-Jun Zeng,et al.  A Stackelberg game-theoretic approach to optimal real-time pricing for the smart grid , 2013, Soft Comput..

[2]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Autonomous Demand-Side Management Based on Game-Theoretic Energy Consumption Scheduling for the Future Smart Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Mengmeng Yu,et al.  Supply–demand balancing for power management in smart grid: A Stackelberg game approach , 2016 .

[4]  S. M. Hasnain Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, Part II: cool thermal storage , 1998 .

[5]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Model predictive control for thermal energy storage and thermal comfort optimization of building demand response in smart grids , 2019, Applied Energy.

[6]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Dependable Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Stackelberg Game Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Optimal control strategy of central air-conditioning systems of buildings at morning start period for enhanced energy efficiency and peak demand limiting , 2018 .

[8]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  A power limiting control strategy based on adaptive utility function for fast demand response of buildings in smart grids , 2016 .

[9]  Walid Saad,et al.  Game-Theoretic Methods for the Smart Grid: An Overview of Microgrid Systems, Demand-Side Management, and Smart Grid Communications , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  T. Başar,et al.  Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory , 1982 .

[11]  Gongguo Tang,et al.  A game-theoretic approach for optimal time-of-use electricity pricing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Sebastian Herkel,et al.  Load shifting using the heating and cooling system of an office building: Quantitative potential evaluation for different flexibility and storage options , 2017 .

[13]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Adaptive full-range decoupled ventilation strategy and air-conditioning systems for cleanrooms and buildings requiring strict humidity control and their performance evaluation , 2019 .

[14]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Optimal and near-optimal indoor temperature and humidity controls for direct load control and proactive building demand response towards smart grids , 2018 .

[15]  Zhaoguang Hu,et al.  Low carbon electricity development in China—An IRSP perspective based on Super Smart Grid , 2011 .

[16]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  A direct load control strategy of centralized air-conditioning systems for building fast demand response to urgent requests of smart grids , 2018 .

[17]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of power systems , 1984 .

[18]  Yongjun Sun,et al.  A robust demand response control of commercial buildings for smart grid under load prediction uncertainty , 2015 .

[19]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[20]  H. Madsen,et al.  Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review , 2014 .

[21]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  An exploratory analysis of California residential customer response to critical peak pricing of electricity , 2007 .

[22]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Demand Response Management With Multiple Utility Companies: A Two-Level Game Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  A game theory-based decentralized control strategy for power demand management of building cluster using thermal mass and energy storage , 2019, Applied Energy.

[24]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  Multi-objective dynamic economic emission dispatch of electric power generation integrated with game theory based demand response programs , 2015 .

[25]  P. Lund,et al.  Improved flexibility with large-scale variable renewable power in cities through optimal demand side management and power-to-heat conversion , 2016 .

[26]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Supply-based feedback control strategy of air-conditioning systems for direct load control of buildings responding to urgent requests of smart grids , 2017 .