Plug n Play: Future Prefab for Smart Green Schools

While relocatable, prefabricated learning environments have formed an important component of school infrastructure in Australia, prefabrication for permanent school buildings is a new and emerging field. This review of prefabrication for schools is timely. In 2017, Australia’s two largest state education departments committed to prefabrication programs for permanent school infrastructure. In this paper we examine the recent history of prefabrication for Australian school buildings in the context of prefabrication internationally. We explore the range of prefabrication methods used locally and internationally and introduce evaluation indicators for school infrastructure. Traditional post-occupancy evaluation (POE) tools measure indicators such as indoor environment quality (IEQ), cost benefit, life cycle performance, and speed of delivery. In response to a shift towards more student-centred learning in a digitally rich environment, recently developed POE tools now investigate the ability of new generation learning environments (NGLEs) to support optimum pedagogical encounters. We conclude with an argument for departments of education to consider how prefabrication provides opportunities for step changes in the delivery, life-cycle management and occupation of smart green schools rather than a program of simply building new schools quicker, better, and cheaper.

[1]  Ivan Rupnik.  Mapping the modular industry , 2017 .

[2]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain , 2012 .

[3]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Construction 2020 - A vision for Australia's Property and Construction Industry , 2004 .

[4]  Stephen Kendall,et al.  Four Decades of Open Building Implementation: Realising Individual Agency in Architectural Infrastructures Designed to Last , 2017 .

[5]  Tiberiu Catalina,et al.  IEQ assessment on schools in the design stage , 2012 .

[6]  Ian McShane,et al.  Learning to share: Australia's Building the Education Revolution and shared schools , 2012 .

[7]  H. Gardner.  Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[8]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Improving the learning process in the latest prefabricated school buildings , 2010 .

[9]  Timothy F. Slaper,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? , 2011 .

[10]  Kenn Fisher,et al.  The evaluation of physical learning environments: a critical review of the literature , 2014 .

[11]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Agile housing for an ageing Australia , 2016 .

[12]  Ron Wakefield,et al.  Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia , 2007 .

[13]  C. Riessman.  Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences , 2007 .

[14]  Kent Larson,et al.  Open Source Building — Reinventing Places of Living , 2004 .

[15]  Paul Gerard Tuohy,et al.  Closing the gap in building performance: learning from BIM benchmark industries , 2015 .

[16]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Environmental impacts of prefabricated school buildings in Catalonia , 2011 .

[17]  S Backhouse,et al.  Redefining the Relocatable: Multidisciplinary design for a wicked problem , 2012 .

[18]  Ghang Lee,et al.  An Introduction to South Korea's BIM Knowledge Base Development Project , 2015 .

[19]  Thomas Bock,et al.  A New Approach to Building Design Modularization , 2014 .

[20]  Clare Newton,et al.  The other half of the picture: post-occupancy evaluation for alignment of space and pedagogy , 2015 .