A significant problem associated with cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis is distinguishing between true and pseudomosaicism. This becomes a diagnostic dilemma when fetal mosaicism corresponds with a known clinical entity. True mosaicism reportedly occurs with a frequency of 0·2 per cent and pseudomosaicism in 0·7 per cent to 2·7 per cent of cases. In the past 12 months, our laboratory has completed 522 fetal karyotypes. Nine cases were found to demonstrate mosaicism, 4 true mosaics (0·8 per cent) and 6 pseudomosaics (1·1 per cent). One case demonstrated both true and pseudomosaicism. In all cases of true mosaicism, the pregnancy was continued and karyotypes completed at birth. Our results demonstrate a danger of rigid adherence to the criteria for true and pseudomosaicism in the examination of amniotic fluids. It is suggested that the criteria established for true and pseudomosaicism may not be valid when an aberrant cell line is found in a single flask and when that aberrant cell line is compatible with a known clinical entity due to a chromosome anomaly.
[1]
G. Prescott,et al.
Mosaic and hypermodal cells in amniotic fluid cell cultures.
,
1980,
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[2]
D. Peakman,et al.
Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures.
,
1979,
American journal of human genetics.
[3]
R. Ladda,et al.
Sex chromosomal mosaicism undetected by prenatal study.
,
1977,
The Journal of pediatrics.
[4]
G. Sutherland,et al.
Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures
,
1975,
Clinical genetics.
[5]
H. Seuánez,et al.
Ribosomal and human-homologous repeated DNA distribution in the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). Comparison with distribution of these DNAs in the other species of the Hominidae.
,
1978,
Cytogenetics and cell genetics.
[6]
Rudd Nl,et al.
Mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures.
,
1977
.