The use of agent-based modelling of genetics in conservation genetics studies

Summary Animal Landscape and Man Simulation System a genetically explicit agent-based model was used to obtain measures for the genetic and demographic status of simulated populations. This investigation aimed to test the applicability of this approach for assessing the effect of environmental perturbations on populations’ temporal and spatial dynamics. This was achieved by assessing how three simple scenarios with increasing degree of environmental disturbance, simulated by populations bottlenecks repeated at different intervals, affected the genetic and demographic characteristics of the simulated population. Model outputs from a simplified landscape scenario concurred with theoretical expectations validating the model in a qualitative way. Differences in medians, means and coefficient of variation of the observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He), population census size (N), effective population size (Ne), inbreeding coefficient (F) and Ne/N ratio were observed for simulated populations. Impacts occurred rapidly after simulated bottleneck events and genetic estimates were less variable, and therefore more reliable, than demographic estimates. Precise genetic consequences of the bottlenecks repeated at different intervals, and resulting population perturbations, are a complex balance between effects on population sub-structure, size and founding events. Agent-based models are appropriate tools to simulate these interactions, being sufficiently flexible to mimic real population processes under a range of environmental conditions. Such models incorporating explicit genetics provide a promising new approach to evaluate the impact of environmental changes on genetic composition of populations.

[1]  P. Hedrick.  Bottleneck(s) or Metapopulation in Cheetahs , 1996 .

[2]  Peter Odderskær,et al.  ALMaSS, an agent-based model for animals in temperate European landscapes , 2003 .

[3]  K. Crandall,et al.  Effective population sizes: missing measures and missing concepts , 1999 .

[4]  Christopher John Topping,et al.  Modeling the influence of temporal and spatial factors on the assessment of impacts of pesticides on skylarks , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  A. Caballero.  Review article Developments in the prediction of effective population size , 1994 .

[6]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[7]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  R. Lande,et al.  THE ROLE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN ADAPTATION AND POPULATION PERSISTENCE IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  M. Beaumont.  Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. , 1999, Genetics.

[10]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Methods for estimating dispersal probabilities and related parameters using marked animals , 2001 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[12]  C. Flather,et al.  Numerically exploring habitat fragmentation effects on populations using cell-based coupled map lattices. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications , 1990 .

[14]  S. Wright.  Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[15]  M Slatkin,et al.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. , 1995, Genetics.

[16]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-oriented analysis and design with applications (2nd ed.) , 1993 .

[17]  J. Merilä,et al.  Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits , 2001 .

[18]  D. Pollock,et al.  Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic interference. , 1997, The Journal of heredity.

[19]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Genetic consequences of population decline in the European otter (Lutra lutra): an assessment of microsatellite DNA variation in Danish otters from 1883 to 1993 , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Michael Lynch,et al.  A Quantitative-Genetic Perspective on Conservation Issues , 1996 .

[21]  G. Luikart,et al.  Statistical analysis of microsatellite DNA data. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Genetic differentiation of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) analysed by means of craniometry and isozymes , 2003 .

[23]  B. Cypher,et al.  Variation in annual estimates of effective population size for San Joaquin kit foxes , 1998 .

[24]  N. Haddad.  Corridor Length and Patch Colonization by a Butterfly, Junonia coenia , 2000 .

[25]  C. Cockerham,et al.  ESTIMATION OF GENE FLOW FROM F‐STATISTICS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[27]  Rousset.  Genetic differentiation between individuals , 1999 .

[28]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[29]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[30]  Armando Caballero,et al.  Developments in the prediction of effective population size , 1994, Heredity.

[31]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Genetic structure in otter (Lutra lutra) populations in Europe: implications for conservation , 2003 .

[32]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The effective size of a subdivided population. , 1997, Genetics.

[33]  L. Nunney.  THE EFFECTIVE SIZE OF A HIERARCHICALLY STRUCTURED POPULATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHOOT PHENOLOGY AND DOMINANCE IN HERBACEOUS VEGETATION , 1977 .

[35]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[36]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Genetic variability in Danish polecats Mustela putorius as assessed by microsatellites , 2004, Wildlife Biology.