Visual dissociation: an illusory conjunction of pictures and forms.

Undergraduates viewed rapidly presented series of color photographs (9/s) and were required to indicate which photograph appeared within a black outline rectangle (the "frame"). Experiment 1 demonstrated that subjects were often confident and wrong, reporting the immediately preceding or following picture in the sequence. Experiment 2 showed that migration of the frame to other pictures cannot be attributed to spatial separation, because the same effect occurred when a small frame was presented in the center of the picture itself. Experiment 3 ruled out masking of the "framed" picture as the cause of the illusion by showing that the framed picture is indeed identified on those trials where the frame appears to be elsewhere. Experiment 4 showed that when simpler, more familiar stimuli (numbers) were presented, a more rapid presentation rate (18/s) was required to obtain the effect. It is proposed that the illusion reflects the action of integrative processes in a very short-term buffer and that it may provide a new tool with which to study the integration of features within scenes.

[1]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[2]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  D. Lawrence Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation* , 1971 .

[4]  I. Biederman,et al.  Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  I. Biederman,et al.  On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  M. Potter Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[7]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .

[8]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[9]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[11]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  H. Intraub The role of implicit naming in pictorial encoding. , 1979 .

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[15]  H. Intraub Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[18]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  D E Broadbent,et al.  Combining Attributes in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Tasks , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  M. Mozer Letter migration in word perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  W. Prinzmetal,et al.  Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  H. Intraub Conceptual masking: the effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  George W. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements and human information processing , 1985 .