Computational tools for calculating alternative muscle force patterns during motion: a comparison of possible solutions.

Comparing the available electromyography (EMG) and the related uncertainties with the space of muscle forces potentially driving the same motion can provide insights into understanding human motion in healthy and pathological neuromotor conditions. However, it is not clear how effective the available computational tools are in completely sample the possible muscle forces. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of Metabolica and the Null-Space algorithm at generating a comprehensive spectrum of possible muscle forces for a representative motion frame. The hip force peak during a selected walking trial was identified using a lower-limb musculoskeletal model. The joint moments, the muscle lever arms, and the muscle force constraints extracted from the model constituted the indeterminate equilibrium equation at the joints. Two spectra, each containing 200,000 muscle force samples, were calculated using Metabolica and the Null-Space algorithm. The full hip force range was calculated using optimization and compared with the hip force ranges derived from the Metabolica and the Null-Space spectra. The Metabolica spectrum spanned a much larger force range than the NS spectrum, reaching 811N difference for the gluteus maximus intermediate bundle. The Metabolica hip force range exhibited a 0.3-0.4 BW error on the upper and lower boundaries of the full hip force range (3.4-11.3 BW), whereas the full range was imposed in the NS spectrum. The results suggest that Metabolica is well suited for exhaustively sample the spectrum of possible muscle recruitment strategy. Future studies will investigate the muscle force range in healthy and pathological neuromotor conditions.

[1]  Daniela Calvetti,et al.  Metabolica: A statistical research tool for analyzing metabolic networks , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[2]  D. Lloyd,et al.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint contact forces during stumbling , 2004, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[5]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces and joint moments and movements from measurements of neural command. , 2004, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[6]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Effect of sub-optimal neuromotor control on the hip joint load during level walking. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Optimal isn’t good enough , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Rositsa Raikova,et al.  Comparison between two muscle models under dynamic conditions , 2005, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[10]  A. Burden How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[11]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  A. A. Nikooyan,et al.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model of the shoulder. , 2012, Human movement science.