Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production

The literature on public perceptions of, and attitudes towards, nanotechnology used in the agrifood sector is reviewed. Research into consumer perceptions and attitudes has focused on general applications of nanotechnology, rather than within the agrifood sector. Perceptions of risk and benefit associated with different applications of nanotechnology, including agrifood applications, shape consumer attitudes, and acceptance, together with ethical concerns related to environmental impact or animal welfare. Attitudes are currently moderately positive across all areas of application. The occurrence of a negative or positive incident in the agri-food sector may crystallise consumer views regarding acceptance or rejection of nanotechnology products.

[1]  J. Gil,et al.  Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy , 2008 .

[2]  Pieter Rutsaert,et al.  The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication , 2013 .

[3]  H. Kastenholz,et al.  Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust , 2007, Appetite.

[4]  Josephine Wills,et al.  Consumers and new food technologies , 2011 .

[5]  Jennifer Kuzma,et al.  Nanotechnology, risk, and oversight: learning lessons from related emerging technologies. , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  V. Markovich,et al.  Magnetic properties of electron-doped La0.23Ca0.77MnO3 nanoparticles , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[7]  N. Gupta.  The views of experts and the public regarding societal preferences for innovation in nanotechnology , 2013 .

[8]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? , 2006 .

[9]  Christian E. H. Beaudrie,et al.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[10]  Andrew Flynn,et al.  Regulating the new rural spaces: the uneven development of land , 1993 .

[11]  Robert M. Yawson,et al.  Systems Mapping of Consumer Acceptance of Agrifood Nanotechnology , 2010 .

[12]  L. DeLouise,et al.  Applications of nanotechnology in dermatology. , 2012, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[13]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology , 2009 .

[14]  M. Sabitha,et al.  Nanotechnology in cosmetics: Opportunities and challenges , 2012, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[15]  Moya Kneafsey,et al.  Product and Place , 1998 .

[16]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[17]  D. Mcclements,et al.  Emulsion-based delivery systems for lipophilic bioactive components. , 2007, Journal of food science.

[18]  Judith Petts,et al.  Public engagement to build trust: false hopes? , 2008 .

[19]  Julia Metag,et al.  Technophobia towards emerging technologies? A comparative analysis of the media coverage of nanotechnology in Austria, Switzerland and Germany , 2014 .

[20]  Richard Shepherd,et al.  Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics , 1997, Science, technology & human values.

[21]  G. Rowe,et al.  Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. , 2011 .

[22]  S. Marette,et al.  Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packaging in France and Germany , 2013 .

[23]  J. Pligt,et al.  Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing , 2006 .

[24]  Arie Rip,et al.  Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology , 2007 .

[25]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  Barriers to using consumer science information in food technology innovations: An exploratory study using Delphi methodology , 2016 .

[26]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging , 2008, Appetite.

[27]  R. V. Schomberg.  A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[28]  Mikael S. Hedenqvist,et al.  Reduced water vapour sorption in cellulose nanocomposites with starch matrix , 2009 .

[29]  R. Kasperson,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk , 2003 .

[30]  Nate Seltenrich,et al.  Nanosilver: Weighing the Risks and Benefits , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[31]  John Pendergrass,et al.  Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[32]  T. Bech-Larsen,et al.  Functional foods in Europe: consumer research, market experiences and regulatory aspects , 2007 .

[33]  M. R. Rao,et al.  Trends in food science and technology. , 1989 .

[34]  Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al.  A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare , 2011 .

[35]  C. R. Chinnamuthu,et al.  Nanotechnology and agroecosystem. , 2009 .

[36]  Regula Valérie Burri,et al.  Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty: Experience, Trust, and Attitudes in a Swiss Nanotechnology Stakeholder Discussion Group , 2007 .

[37]  S. Robinson,et al.  Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.

[38]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[39]  L. Conti,et al.  in vitro and in vivo , 2016 .

[40]  O. Renn,et al.  Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance , 2006, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[41]  L. P Waring.  Better safe than sorry , 1982 .

[42]  W. Kenyon.  A Critical Review of Citizens' Juries: How Useful are they in Facilitating Public Participation in the EU Water Framework Directive? , 2005 .

[43]  G. Beall,et al.  Direct measurement of the constrained polymer region in polyamide/clay nanocomposites and the implications for gas diffusion , 2009 .

[44]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Food nanotechnology in the news. Coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade , 2011, Appetite.

[45]  Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al.  Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[46]  John Ingram,et al.  A vision for attaining food security , 2012 .

[47]  Nurettin Sahin,et al.  Nanotechnology awareness, opinions and risk perceptions among middle school students , 2013 .

[48]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  Nanotechnology in the Agri-Food Sector. Implications for the Future , 2011 .

[49]  R. Lion,et al.  Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2016, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[50]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  The role of agronomic research in climate change and food security policy , 2008 .

[51]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques , 2005 .

[52]  Tanya Sheetz,et al.  Nanotechnology: Awareness and societal concerns , 2005 .

[53]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology , 2011 .

[54]  Michaela Maier,et al.  Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science , 2011 .

[55]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Perceived risks and benefits of nanotechnology applied to the food and packaging sector in México , 2012 .

[56]  Kerry Kirwan,et al.  Food security: perception failures. , 2010, Science.

[57]  Dae Hong Jeong,et al.  Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. , 2007, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[58]  J. Prajapati,et al.  Potential of Nanotechnology in Functional Foods , 2013 .

[59]  David K. Holdsworth,et al.  Social Stigma and Consumer Benefits , 2012 .

[60]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[61]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Acceptance of nanotechnology in food and food packaging: a path model analysis , 2010 .

[62]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies , 2005 .

[63]  Thalappil Pradeep,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology in developing countries , 2006 .

[64]  Evan S. Michelson,et al.  Americans' Nanotechnology Risk Perception: , 2008 .

[65]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[66]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production , 2009, Appetite.

[67]  S. Cimmino,et al.  Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials , 2011 .

[68]  Jeremy Phillipson,et al.  Socio-technical innovation for sustainable food chains: roles for social science , 2008 .

[69]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Agglomeration and sedimentation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (n-TiO2) in synthetic and real waters , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[70]  Helge Torgersen,et al.  Synthetic biology in society: learning from past experience? , 2009, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[71]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[72]  Jeremy Burchardt,et al.  AGRICULTURAL HISTORY, RURAL HISTORY, OR COUNTRYSIDE HISTORY? , 2007, The Historical Journal.

[73]  Ai Lin Chun,et al.  Will the public swallow nanofood? , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[74]  P. Glasner.  Beyond the genome: Reconstituting the new genetics , 2002 .

[75]  Val Vallyathan,et al.  Single- and Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Versus Asbestos: Are the Carbon Nanotubes a New Health Risk to Humans? , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[76]  A. Cardello.  Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: effects on product liking☆ , 2003, Appetite.

[77]  James J Moon,et al.  Engineering Nano‐ and Microparticles to Tune Immunity , 2012, Advanced materials.

[78]  Xiaoming Hao,et al.  Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[79]  Ashish Ranjan,et al.  Targeting Brucella melitensis with polymeric nanoparticles containing streptomycin and doxycycline. , 2009, FEMS microbiology letters.

[80]  Maeve Henchion,et al.  Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures with regard to high pressure processing: A means-end chain application to the chilled ready meals category , 2011 .

[81]  Carmen Hubbard,et al.  Reconsidering the political economy of farm animal welfare: An anatomy of market failure , 2013 .

[82]  W. Bainbridge,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2001 .

[83]  Y. Wang,et al.  Enhancement of antibacterial activity of tilmicosin against Staphylococcus aureus by solid lipid nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. , 2012, Veterinary journal.

[84]  G. Gaskell,et al.  GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[85]  F. Wickson,et al.  Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology , 2011 .

[86]  L. Bredahl.  Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions With Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey , 2001 .

[87]  David B. Schmidt,et al.  Consumer response to functional foods in the 21st century. , 2000 .

[88]  S. Bellucci,et al.  Public perception of nanotechnology , 2008 .

[89]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: a psychometric study. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[90]  Paul B. Thompson,et al.  What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos , 2008 .

[91]  Sujit Bhattacharya,et al.  Nanotechnology: 'Risk Governance' in India , 2012 .

[92]  Michael D. Cobb,et al.  Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust , 2004, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[93]  J. Eiser,et al.  Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies , 2002 .

[94]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Nanotechnology applied to European food production – A review of ethical and regulatory issues , 2013 .

[95]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  Nanotechnology as an experiment in democracy: how do citizens form opinions about technology and policy? , 2011 .

[96]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[97]  Emily Caldwell,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Bacterial Aggregation Mediated by Bioactive Nanoparticles , 2005 .

[98]  Brian Salter,et al.  Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: The case of BSE , 2002 .

[99]  Mitsuru Akashi,et al.  Biodegradable Nanoparticles as Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems: Regulation of Immune Responses by Nanoparticle-Based Vaccine , 2011 .

[100]  Shirley S. Ho,et al.  Value Predispositions, Mass Media, and Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology: The Interplay of Public and Experts , 2011 .

[101]  S. Marette,et al.  The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain , 2011, Public understanding of science.

[102]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[103]  Franc Mali,et al.  Daily Newspapers’ Views on Nanotechnology in Slovenia , 2012 .

[104]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  Expert views on societal responses to different applications of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of experts in countries with different economic and regulatory environments , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[105]  Frenk van Harreveld,et al.  In doubt and disorderly: Ambivalence promotes compensatory perceptions of order. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[106]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[107]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Nanotechnology — A new field of ethical inquiry? , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[108]  Barbara Herr Harthorn,et al.  From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modifi cation of Food , 2011 .

[109]  S. Marette,et al.  Impact of Environmental, Societal and Health Information on Consumers' Choices for Nanofood , 2009 .

[110]  Maurizio Canavari,et al.  Local and Sustainable Food Supply: The Role of European Retail Consumer Co-operatives , 2011 .

[111]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies , 2005 .

[112]  M. Roco.  Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[113]  John T Lang,et al.  Who Does the Public Trust? The Case of Genetically Modified Food in the United States , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[114]  Enkeleda Dervishi,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. , 2013, Small.

[115]  L. Reisch,et al.  ‘Better safe than sorry’: consumer perceptions of and deliberations on nanotechnologies , 2011 .

[116]  Jane Macoubrie.  Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government , 2006 .

[117]  Erdal Senocak.  A Survey on Nanotechnology in the View of the Turkish Public , 2014 .

[118]  D. Stemerding,et al.  Discourses on synthetic biology in Europe , 2013 .

[119]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products , 2008 .

[120]  Q. Chaudhry,et al.  Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[121]  Michael D. Cobb.  Framing Effects on Public Opinion about Nanotechnology , 2005 .

[122]  Digvir S. Jayas,et al.  Nanotechnology for the Food and Bioprocessing Industries , 2010, Food and bioprocess technology.

[123]  A. Knight,et al.  Perceptions, Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process , 2009, Public understanding of science.

[124]  Bosoon Park,et al.  An Au/Si hetero-nanorod-based biosensor for Salmonella detection , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[125]  Matthew Kearnes,et al.  Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences? , 2005 .

[126]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  Framing Emerging Technologies , 2012 .

[127]  Barbara Herr Harthorn,et al.  Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent U.S. Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[128]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[129]  Barbara Harthorn,et al.  Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[130]  Maria Powell,et al.  Meaningful Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology , 2008 .

[131]  Jordan Frith,et al.  Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks , 2011 .

[132]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[133]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies–converging societal response research? , 2011 .

[134]  Holger Schütz,et al.  Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology , 2008 .

[135]  K. L. Zimmermann,et al.  Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification - a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013 .

[136]  Peter Kriwy,et al.  Health and environmental consciousness, costs of behaviour and the purchase of organic food , 2012 .

[137]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Social Trust and the Management of Risk , 2006 .

[138]  Parvin Farshchi,et al.  Nanotechnology in the public eye: the case of Iran, as a developing country , 2011 .

[139]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.