Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure

Human decision-making almost always takes place under time pressure. When people are engaged in activities such as shopping, driving, or playing chess, they have to continually balance the demands for fast decisions against the demands for accurate decisions. In the cognitive sciences, this balance is thought to be modulated by a response threshold, the neural substrate of which is currently subject to speculation. In a speed decision-making experiment, we presented participants with cues that indicated different requirements for response speed. Application of a mathematical model for the behavioral data confirmed that cueing for speed lowered the response threshold. Functional neuroimaging showed that cueing for speed activates the striatum and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), brain structures that are part of a closed-loop motor circuit involved in the preparation of voluntary action plans. Moreover, activation in the striatum is known to release the motor system from global inhibition, thereby facilitating faster but possibly premature actions. Finally, the data show that individual variation in the activation of striatum and pre-SMA is selectively associated with individual variation in the amplitude of the adjustments in the response threshold estimated by the mathematical model. These results demonstrate that when people have to make decisions under time pressure their striatum and pre-SMA show increased levels of activation.

[1]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[5]  J. Deniau,et al.  Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. II. The striato-nigral influence on thalamocortical cells of the ventromedial thalamic nucleus , 1985, Brain Research.

[6]  J. Deniau,et al.  Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. I. The striato-nigral influence on tecto-spinal/tecto-diencephalic neurons , 1985, Brain Research.

[7]  J. Deniau,et al.  Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Adaptive Critics and the Basal Ganglia , 1995 .

[11]  J. Mink THE BASAL GANGLIA: FOCUSED SELECTION AND INHIBITION OF COMPETING MOTOR PROGRAMS , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[12]  M. Delong,et al.  Functional and pathophysiological models of the basal ganglia , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  J. Tanji,et al.  Both supplementary and presupplementary motor areas are crucial for the temporal organization of multiple movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[15]  M. Inase,et al.  Corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic input zones from the presupplementary motor area in the macaque monkey: comparison with the input zones from the supplementary motor area , 1999, Brain Research.

[16]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[17]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  J. Wickens,et al.  Computational models of the basal ganglia: from robots to membranes , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[21]  A. Heathcote,et al.  Reply to Speckman and Rouder: A theoretical basis for QML , 2004 .

[22]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades , 2004, Neural Networks.

[23]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Graybiel The basal ganglia: learning new tricks and loving it , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making , 2006, Neural Networks.

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[27]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Cortico–basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  The Basal Ganglia and Cortex Implement Optimal Decision Making Between Alternative Actions , 2007, Neural Computation.

[30]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  R. Marois,et al.  fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[35]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.