Supervised Pattern Recognition for the Prediction of Contrast-enhancement Appearance in Brain Tumors from Multivariate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy §

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop a pattern classification algorithm for use in predicting the location of new contrast-enhancement in brain tumor patients using data obtained via multivariate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging from a prior scan. We also explore the use of feature selection or weighting in improving the accuracy of the pattern classifier. METHODS AND MATERIALS Contrast-enhanced MR images, perfusion images, diffusion images, and proton spectroscopic imaging data were obtained from 26 patients with glioblastoma multiforme brain tumors, divided into a design set and an unseen test set for verification of results. A k-NN algorithm was implemented to classify unknown data based on a set of training data with ground truth derived from post-treatment contrast-enhanced images; the quality of the k-NN results was evaluated using a leave-one-out cross-validation method. A genetic algorithm was implemented to select optimal features and feature weights for the k-NN algorithm. The binary representation of the weights was varied from 1 to 4 bits. Each individual parameter was thresholded as a simple classification technique, and the results compared with the k-NN. RESULTS The feature selection k-NN was able to achieve a sensitivity of 0.78+/-0.18 and specificity of 0.79+/-0.06 on the holdout test data using only 7 of the 38 original features. Similar results were obtained with non-binary weights, but using a larger number of features. Overfitting was also observed in the higher bit representations. The best single-variable classifier, based on a choline-to-NAA abnormality index computed from spectroscopic data, achieved a sensitivity of 0.79+/-0.20 and specificity of 0.71+/-0.11. The k-NN results had lower variation across patients than the single-variable classifiers. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that the optimized k-NN rule could be used for quantitative analysis of multivariate images, and be applied to a specific clinical research question. Selecting features was found to be useful in improving the accuracy of feature weighting algorithms and improving the comprehensibility of the results. We believe that in addition to lending insight into parameter relevance, such algorithms may be useful in aiding radiological interpretation of complex multimodality datasets.

[1]  Arend Heerschap,et al.  A chemometric approach for brain tumor classification using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  D. Vigneron,et al.  An automated technique for the quantitative assessment of 3D‐MRSI data from patients with glioma , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  R. Guillevin,et al.  Simulation of anisotropic growth of low‐grade gliomas using diffusion tensor imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Arend Heerschap,et al.  Combination of feature‐reduced MR spectroscopic and MR imaging data for improved brain tumor classification , 2005, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  J Hennig,et al.  Human brain tumors: assessment with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  Qiang Li,et al.  Reduction of bias and variance for evaluation of computer-aided diagnostic schemes. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Jack Sklansky,et al.  A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection , 1989, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  T Kubota,et al.  Tumor vascularity in the brain: evaluation with dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Applying instance-based techniques to prediction of final outcome in acute stroke , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[10]  M Ala-Korpela,et al.  Automated classification of human brain tumours by neural network analysis using in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic metabolite phenotypes. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[11]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  The Utility of Feature Weighting in Nearest-Neighbor Algorithms , 1997 .

[12]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  H P Chan,et al.  Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue. , 1996, Medical physics.

[14]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[15]  David W. Aha,et al.  A Review and Empirical Evaluation of Feature Weighting Methods for a Class of Lazy Learning Algorithms , 1997, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[16]  Hitoshi Iba,et al.  Genetic Programming 1998: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  L. Darrell Whitley,et al.  Transforming the search space with Gray coding , 1994, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.

[18]  Sylvie Grand,et al.  A new approach for analyzing proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic images of brain tumors: nosologic images , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Soonmee Cha,et al.  Partial‐volume model for determining white matter and gray matter cerebral blood volume for analysis of gliomas , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  A R Tate,et al.  Towards a method for automated classification of 1H MRS spectra from brain tumours , 1998, NMR in biomedicine.

[21]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[23]  A. W. Simonetti,et al.  The use of multivariate MR imaging intensities versus metabolic data from MR spectroscopic imaging for brain tumour classification. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[24]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  S. Nelson Analysis of volume MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging data for the evaluation of patients with brain tumors , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Improved water and lipid suppression for 3D PRESS CSI using rf band selective inversion with gradient dephasing (basing) , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  I. Tomek An Experiment with the Edited Nearest-Neighbor Rule , 1976 .

[28]  D. Arnold,et al.  Using pattern analysis of in vivo proton MRSI data to improve the diagnosis and surgical management of patients with brain tumors , 1998, NMR in biomedicine.

[29]  J. Murray,et al.  Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[30]  Larry J. Eshelman,et al.  The CHC Adaptive Search Algorithm: How to Have Safe Search When Engaging in Nontraditional Genetic Recombination , 1990, FOGA.

[31]  K. Krabbe,et al.  MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[32]  M. Berger,et al.  Histopathological validation of a three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopy index as a predictor of tumor presence. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[33]  T R Brown,et al.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with glial tumors: a multicenter study. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[34]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  R D Tien,et al.  MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion-weighted echoplanar pulse sequences. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Editing for the k-nearest neighbors rule by a genetic algorithm , 1995, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[37]  Tony R. Martinez,et al.  Reduction Techniques for Instance-Based Learning Algorithms , 2000, Machine Learning.

[38]  Frans Coenen,et al.  Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXI, Proceedings of AI-2004, the Twenty-fourth SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Queens' College, Cambridge, UK, 13-15 December 2004 , 2005, SGAI Conf..

[39]  G Johnson,et al.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[40]  Padraig Cunningham,et al.  Overfitting in Wrapper-Based Feature Subset Selection: The Harder You Try the Worse it Gets , 2004, SGAI Conf..

[41]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  Genetic Search for Feature Subset Selection: A Comparison Between CHC and GENESIS , 1998 .