Operation of passive membrane systems for drinking water treatment.

The widespread adoption of submerged hollow fibre ultrafiltration (UF) for drinking water treatment is currently hindered by the complexity and cost of these membrane systems, especially in small/remote communities. Most of the complexity is associated with auxiliary fouling control measures, which include backwashing, air sparging and chemical cleaning. Recent studies have demonstrated that sustained operation without fouling control measures is possible, but little is known regarding the conditions under which extended operation can be sustained with minimal to no fouling control measures. The present study investigated the contribution of different auxiliary fouling control measures to the permeability that can be sustained, with the intent of minimizing the mechanical and operational complexity of submerged hollow fiber UF membrane systems while maximizing their throughput capacity. Sustained conditions could be achieved without backwashing, air sparging or chemical cleaning (i.e. passive operation), indicating that these fouling control measures can be eliminated, substantially simplifying the mechanical and operational complexity of submerged hollow fiber UF systems. The adoption of hydrostatic pressure (i.e. gravity) to provide the driving force for permeation further reduced the system complexity. Approximately 50% of the organic material in the raw water was removed during treatment. The sustained passive operation and effective removal of organic material was likely due to the microbial community that established itself on the membrane surface. The permeability that could be sustained was however only approximately 20% of that which can be maintained with fouling control measures. Retaining a small amount of air sparging (i.e. a few minutes daily) and incorporating a daily 1-h relaxation (i.e. permeate flux interruption) period prior to sparging more than doubled the permeability that could be sustained. Neither the approach used to interrupt the permeate flux nor that developed to draw air into the system for sparging using gravity add substantial mechanical or operational complexity to the system. The high throughput capacity that can be sustained by eliminating all but a couple of simple fouling control measures make passive membrane systems ideally suited to provide high quality water especially where access to financial resources, technical expertise and/or electrical power is limited.

[1]  T. R. Bott,et al.  Direct measurement of the adhesive strength of biofilms in pipes by micromanipulation , 1998 .

[2]  C. Picioreanu,et al.  Influence of biomass production and detachment forces on biofilm structures in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  W. Gujer,et al.  Intermittent operation of ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration for decentralized drinking water treatment. , 2012, Water research.

[4]  W. Pronk,et al.  Characterisation of aquatic humic and non-humic matter with size-exclusion chromatography--organic carbon detection--organic nitrogen detection (LC-OCD-OND). , 2011, Water research.

[5]  W. Pronk,et al.  Mechanisms of membrane fouling during ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration , 2011 .

[6]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Evaluation of fouling deposition, fouling reversibility and energy consumption of submerged hollow fiber membrane systems with periodic backwash , 2014 .

[7]  Simon Judd,et al.  Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: A review , 2010 .

[8]  P. Bérubé,et al.  Removal of disinfection by-product precursors with ozone-UV advanced oxidation process. , 2005, Water research.

[9]  Christophe A. Serra,et al.  Use of air sparging to improve backwash efficiency in hollow-fiber modules , 1999 .

[10]  J. Pernthaler,et al.  Biodegradation of Microcystins during Gravity-Driven Membrane (GDM) Ultrafiltration , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  M. Mohseni,et al.  The fate of natural organic matter during UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation of drinking waterA paper submitted to the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science. , 2009 .

[12]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Modelling biological processes in water treatment: the integrated biofiltration model , 2002 .

[13]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. , 2010, Water research.

[14]  V. Chen,et al.  Evolution of fouling deposition and removal on hollow fibre membrane during filtration with periodical backwash , 2011 .

[15]  A. Fane,et al.  The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes , 2003 .

[16]  G. S. Wang,et al.  Monitoring natural organic matter in water with scanning spectrophotometer. , 2001, Environment international.

[17]  Jhuma Ganguly,et al.  The Role of Oxidoreductases in Determining the Function of the Neisserial Lipid A Phosphoethanolamine Transferase Required for Resistance to Polymyxin , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  Xiangru Zhang,et al.  Characterization of natural organic matter in drinking water: Sample preparation and analytical approaches , 2016 .

[19]  N. Derlon,et al.  Presence of biofilms on ultrafiltration membrane surfaces increases the quality of permeate produced during ultra-low pressure gravity-driven membrane filtration. , 2014, Water research.

[20]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions , 2014 .

[21]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Biofilm detachment mechanisms in a liquid‐fluidized bed , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  M. Mohseni,et al.  The fate of natural organic matter during UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation of drinking water , 2013 .

[23]  D. Simpson.  Biofilm processes in biologically active carbon water purification. , 2008, Water research.

[24]  E. Bouwer,et al.  Removal of Natural Organic Matter (NOM) from Drinking Water Supplies by Ozone-Biofiltration , 1999 .