Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the levels and factors that influence the abandonment of assistive products by users of a local reference rehabilitation center. Methods: This observational study involved users who received services and assistive products provided by our center of rehabilitation. Users were identified using the records of the center and their responses about the abandonment were collected through face-to-face interviews. Results: The abandonment level of assistive products was 19.38%. 83.5% of the users use at least one of the assistive products they have received. Rigid and folding frame wheelchairs, with and without postural support devices, as well as shower wheelchairs, presented the lowest abandonment levels, followed by canes and lower limb orthoses. Upper limb orthoses, Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis(KAFO), walkers, crutches and lower and upper limb prostheses all presented higher abandonment levels. Conclusion: The simultaneous use of mutiple assistive products, users perception on the importance of using them, and completing the rehabilitation treatment were found to impact on the short and long-term use of products. The study offers inputs to decision making and planning for assistive technology provision in developing countries with regard to expected demand and service delivery. Implications for Rehabilitation Data about the abandonment of assistive products in Sao Paulo, Brazil, could assist informing decision making on provision and servicing of these products in similar settings. The strong correlation found between abandonment levels and the simultaneous use of multiple devices should be taken into account by health professionals when prescribing assistive products and providing guidance to users. The need for follow up on the use of assistive products after discharge from rehabilitation treatment becomes strikingly clear, as data show that completing treatment is significantly relevant when evaluating abandonment levels. As assistive products users’ perception about the importance of using these devices is shown to be significant in explaining abandonment, it is mandatory that health and rehabilitation professionals take it into account when providing guidance and training users.

[1]  Eduardo Inglez Yamanaka,et al.  Lucy Montoro Rehabilitation Network mobile unit: an alternative public healthcare policy , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[2]  Jenny Strong,et al.  Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT) , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[3]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[4]  Marti L. Riemer-Reiss,et al.  Factors Associated with Assistive Technology Discontinuance among Individuals with Disabilities , 2000 .

[5]  Stefano Federici,et al.  The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. , 2016, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: An AAATE/EASTIN position paper , 2013 .

[7]  Susan Quine,et al.  Assistive devices: self-reported use by older people in Victoria. , 2002, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[8]  Mark Harniss,et al.  Assistive technology access and service delivery in resource-limited environments: introduction to a special issue of Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  Donna Drynan,et al.  Getting it “right”: how collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[10]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Assistive technology assessment handbook , 2017 .

[11]  F. M. R. M. Ferreira,et al.  Assistive technology devices: abandonment related factors , 2015 .

[12]  G. Gelderblom,et al.  Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview , 2004 .

[13]  William C. Mann,et al.  An Analysis of Problems with Canes Encountered by Elderly Persons , 1995 .

[14]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment , 2016, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[15]  Amalendu Samanta,et al.  Wheelchair charity: A useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Rogers,et al.  The Use and Effectiveness of Assistive Devices Possessed by Patients Seen in Home Care , 1987 .

[17]  Celso Rodrigues da Costa,et al.  Dispositivos de tecnologia assistiva: fatores relacionados ao abandono 1 , 2015 .

[18]  H. Lossius,et al.  Disability and Rehabilitation , 2015 .