Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words

This paper reviews the remarkably similar experiences of school science reported by high school students in Sweden, England, and Australia. It compares student narratives from interpretive studies by Lindahl, by Osborne and Collins, and by Lyons, identifying core themes relating to critical contemporary issues in science education. These themes revolve around the transmissive pedagogy, decontextualized content, and unnecessary difficulty of school science commonly reported by students in the studies. Their collective experiences are used as a framework for examining student conceptions of, and attitudes to, school science more generally, drawing on an extensive range of international literature. The paper argues that the experiences of students in the three studies provide important insights into the widespread declines in interest and enrolments in high school and university science courses.

[1]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists , 2000 .

[2]  S. Hollingsworth,et al.  Continuing the Journey Toward Gender Equity , 1994 .

[3]  Mary M. Atwater,et al.  A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science , 1995 .

[4]  J. Steve Oliver,et al.  A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students , 1990 .

[5]  G. Aikenhead.  Review of Research on Humanistic Perspectives in Science Curricula , 2003 .

[6]  M. Hanrahan.  Improving Engagement in Science: A Biosocial System Perspective. , 2003 .

[7]  C. Hart.  Framing curriculum discursively: Theoretical perspectives on the experience of VCE physics , 2002 .

[8]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Students' conceptions of science across the years of schooling , 1997 .

[9]  Michael O. Martin.  TIMSS 1999 international science report : Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade , 2000 .

[10]  D. Tippins,et al.  Cases in Middle and Secondary Science Education: The Promise and Dilemmas , 1999 .

[11]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[12]  I. Mullis.  TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report : Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade , 2000 .

[13]  Patricia D. Morrell,et al.  Student's Attitudes Toward School and Classroom Science: Are They Independent Phenomena? , 1998 .

[14]  G. Aikenhead.  STS Science in Canada From Policy to Student Evaluation , 2000 .

[15]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Providing suitable content in the 'science for all' curriculum , 2000 .

[16]  Norman Reid,et al.  Attitudes towards Physics , 2002 .

[17]  Valerie Crane,et al.  Informal Science Learning: What the Research Says About Television, Science Museums, and Community-Based Projects , 1994 .

[18]  R. Yager.  Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education. , 1996 .

[19]  文部科学省.  Human resource in science and technology required of Japan in the future , 2003 .

[20]  Ronald K. Thornton.  USING THE RESULTS OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION TO IMPROVE SCIENCE LEARNING , 1999 .

[21]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Language and cultural factors in students' perceptions of teacher communication style , 1997 .

[22]  Stephen Knutton,et al.  Using out-of-school experience in science lessons: reality or rhetoric? , 1997 .

[23]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  The Hidden Curriculum—Faculty-Made Tests in Science , 1997 .

[24]  K. C. Garg,et al.  Decline in science education in India: A case study at + 2 and undergraduate level , 2003 .

[25]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Students' perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary school , 1996 .

[26]  R. Oaxaca,et al.  Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. A Life Sequence Analysis. , 1998 .

[27]  How to Enhance Students’ Motivation and Ability to Communicate in Science Class-discourse , 2001 .

[28]  N. Lampert.  Patterns of Participation , 1990 .

[29]  Judith M. Ramsden.  Mission impossible?: Can anything be done about attitudes to science? , 1998 .

[30]  Robert L. Shrigley.  Attitude and behavior are correlates , 1990 .

[31]  David Hendley,et al.  Pupils’ Subject Preferences at Key Stage 3 in South Wales , 1996 .

[32]  A. Kelly.  Option Choice for Girls and Boys. , 1988 .

[33]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[34]  John E. Penick.  Where's the Science?. , 1991 .

[35]  Britta Lindahl.  Lust att lära naturvetenskap och teknik? : en longitudinell studie om vägen till gymnasiet , 2003 .

[36]  J. Head,et al.  The personal response to science , 1985 .

[37]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[38]  L. Delpit.  The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children , 1988 .

[39]  Victoria Costa,et al.  When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science , 1995 .

[40]  P. Couturier.  Japan , 1988, The Lancet.

[41]  D. Fisher,et al.  Cultural Differences in Students' Perceptions of Science Teachers' Interpersonal Behaviour. , 2000 .

[42]  Maurice Walker,et al.  Patterns of participation in year 12 , 2003 .

[43]  Brian E. Woolnough,et al.  Changing pupils' attitudes to careers in science , 1996 .

[44]  R. Dunlea.  Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) , 2005 .

[45]  Brian E. Woolnough,et al.  Factors affecting students' choice of science and engineering , 1994 .

[46]  J. Osborne,et al.  Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study , 2001 .

[47]  J. Osborne,et al.  Attitudes To Science: Issues and Concerns. , 1998 .

[48]  D. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation , 1991 .

[49]  J. Bennett.  Science with attitude: the perennial issue of pupils' responses to science , 2001 .

[50]  Peter E. Childs,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF IRISH STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO CHEMISTRY: THE PROMOTION OF CHEMISTRY IN SCHOOLS PROJECT , 2003 .

[51]  Roy Hawkey,et al.  Expectations of Secondary Science: Realisation and Retrospect. , 1998 .

[52]  M. B. Ormerod,et al.  A comparative study of three methods of measuring the attitudes to science of 10‐ to 11‐year‐old pupils , 1983 .

[53]  Neil Havard.  Student attitudes to studying A-level sciences , 1996 .

[54]  H. Eijkelhof,et al.  Algemene natuurwetenschappen (ANW): A new course on public understanding of science for senior general secondary education in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[55]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[56]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[57]  Sung Jin Kim,et al.  Republic of Korea. , 2010, Population policy compendium.

[58]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum , 2000 .

[59]  K. Shim,et al.  A study of Korean middle school students’ interests in biology and their implications for biology education , 1998 .

[60]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[61]  Joan Solomon,et al.  Social Influences on the Construction of Pupils' Understanding of Science , 1987 .

[62]  M. Watts,et al.  CURRICULUM MATTERS: Facts and feelings: exploring the affective domain in the learning of physics , 2000 .

[63]  Rani George,et al.  A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88 , 1998 .