Optimal polynomial based quantum eigenstate filtering with application to solving quantum linear systems

We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal $\mathcal{\widetilde{O}}(d\kappa\log(1/\epsilon))$ query complexity for a $d$-sparse matrix, where $\kappa$ is the condition number, and $\epsilon$ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.

[1]  L. Wossnig,et al.  Quantum Linear System Algorithm for Dense Matrices. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[2]  Jeongwan Haah,et al.  Product Decomposition of Periodic Functions in Quantum Signal Processing , 2018, Quantum.

[3]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Variable time amplitude amplification and a faster quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations , 2010, ArXiv.

[4]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[5]  George A. Hagedorn,et al.  A note on the switching adiabatic theorem , 2012, 1204.2318.

[6]  M. Ruskai,et al.  Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation , 2006, quant-ph/0603175.

[7]  Nathan Wiebe,et al.  Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics , 2018, STOC.

[8]  Chunhao Wang,et al.  Quantum-inspired sublinear classical algorithms for solving low-rank linear systems , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Hamiltonian Simulation with Nearly Optimal Dependence on all Parameters , 2015, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[10]  Stacey Jeffery,et al.  A Unified Framework of Quantum Walk Search , 2019, STACS.

[11]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Zeno's paradox in quantum theory , 1976 .

[12]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[13]  Berry phase from a quantum Zeno effect , 1999, quant-ph/9903102.

[14]  Roy,et al.  Quantum anti-zeno paradox , 2000, Physical review letters.

[15]  E. Knill,et al.  Quantum simulations of classical annealing processes. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[16]  D. McMahon Adiabatic Quantum Computation , 2008 .

[17]  Nathan Wiebe,et al.  Hamiltonian Simulation in the Interaction Picture , 2018, 1805.00675.

[18]  Ewin Tang,et al.  A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[19]  V. Giovannetti,et al.  Non-Abelian phases from quantum Zeno dynamics , 2013, 1305.6433.

[20]  Lov K. Grover,et al.  Fixed-point quantum search. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[21]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Quantum search by measurement , 2002, quant-ph/0204013.

[22]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[23]  Mario Szegedy,et al.  Finding Angles for Quantum Signal Processing with Machine Precision. , 2020, 2003.02831.

[24]  Lin Lin,et al.  Quantum linear system solver based on time-optimal adiabatic quantum computing and quantum approximate optimization algorithm , 2019, ArXiv.

[25]  R. Somma,et al.  Quantum Algorithms for Systems of Linear Equations Inspired by Adiabatic Quantum Computing. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  J. Ignacio Cirac,et al.  Faster ground state preparation and high-precision ground energy estimation with fewer qubits , 2017, Journal of Mathematical Physics.

[27]  Alexei Y. Kitaev,et al.  Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer Problem , 1995, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[28]  Damian S. Steiger,et al.  Quantum Algorithm for Spectral Measurement with a Lower Gate Count. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[29]  Srinivasan Arunachalam,et al.  Optimizing quantum optimization algorithms via faster quantum gradient computation , 2017, SODA.

[30]  Yigit Subasi,et al.  Improved implementation of reflection operators , 2018 .

[31]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2014, 1411.4028.

[32]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Quantum Algorithm for Systems of Linear Equations with Exponentially Improved Dependence on Precision , 2015, SIAM J. Comput..

[33]  Sergio Boixo,et al.  Eigenpath traversal by phase randomization , 2009, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[34]  Theodore J. Yoder,et al.  Fixed-point quantum search with an optimal number of queries. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[35]  P. Facchi,et al.  Quantum Zeno dynamics: mathematical and physical aspects , 2008, 0903.3297.

[36]  P. EJtDiiS SOME REMARKS ON POLYNOMIALS , 2002 .

[37]  Ewin Tang,et al.  Quantum-inspired classical algorithms for principal component analysis and supervised clustering , 2018, ArXiv.

[38]  J. Traub,et al.  Quantum algorithm and circuit design solving the Poisson equation , 2012, 1207.2485.

[39]  A. Harrow,et al.  Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[40]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum-inspired algorithms in practice , 2019, Quantum.

[41]  P. Wocjan,et al.  Speedup via quantum sampling , 2008, 0804.4259.

[42]  Nisheeth K. Vishnoi,et al.  Faster Algorithms via Approximation Theory , 2014, Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci..

[43]  D. Poulin,et al.  Preparing ground States of quantum many-body systems on a quantum computer. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[44]  Francesco A. Evangelista,et al.  A Multireference Quantum Krylov Algorithm for Strongly Correlated Electrons. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[45]  I. Chuang,et al.  Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization , 2016, Quantum.

[46]  Yulong Dong,et al.  Efficient Phase Factor Evaluation in Quantum Signal Processing , 2020 .

[47]  David Poulin,et al.  Resource estimate for quantum many-body ground state preparation on a quantum computer. , 2020 .

[48]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Variable time amplitude amplification and quantum algorithms for linear algebra problems , 2012, STACS.

[49]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum-inspired low-rank stochastic regression with logarithmic dependence on the dimension , 2018, ArXiv.

[50]  Peter L. McMahon,et al.  Quantum Filter Diagonalization: Quantum Eigendecomposition without Full Quantum Phase Estimation , 2019, 1909.08925.

[51]  G. Brassard,et al.  Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation , 2000, quant-ph/0005055.

[52]  M. Sipser,et al.  Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution , 2000, quant-ph/0001106.

[53]  Stacey Jeffery,et al.  The power of block-encoded matrix powers: improved regression techniques via faster Hamiltonian simulation , 2018, ICALP.

[54]  Amnon Ta-Shma,et al.  Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge , 2003, STOC '03.

[55]  D. Poulin,et al.  Sampling from the thermal quantum Gibbs state and evaluating partition functions with a quantum computer. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[56]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Universal Quantum Simulators , 1996, Science.

[57]  M. Szegedy,et al.  Quantum Walk Based Search Algorithms , 2008, TAMC.

[58]  Alain Sarlette,et al.  Quantum fast-forwarding: Markov chains and graph property testing , 2018, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[59]  Xiao Yuan,et al.  Variational algorithms for linear algebra , 2019, Science Bulletin.

[60]  I. Chuang,et al.  Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[61]  Ryan LaRose,et al.  Variational Quantum Linear Solver: A Hybrid Algorithm for Linear Systems , 2019, 1909.05820.