Topographical complexity of multidimensional energy landscapes

A scheme for visualizing and quantifying the complexity of multidimensional energy landscapes and multiple pathways is presented employing principal component-based disconnectivity graphs and the Shannon entropy of relative “sizes” of superbasins. The principal component-based disconnectivity graphs incorporate a metric relationship between the stationary points of the system, which enable us to capture not only the actual assignment of the superbasins but also the size of each superbasin in the multidimensional configuration space. The landscape complexity measure quantifies the degree of topographical complexity of a multidimensional energy landscape and tells us at which energy regime branching of the main path becomes significant, making the system more likely to be kinetically trapped in local minima. The path complexity measure quantifies the difficulty encountered by the system to reach a connected local minimum by the path in question, implying that the more significant the branching points along the path the more difficult it is to end up in the desired local minimum. As an illustrative example, we apply this analysis to two kinds of small model protein systems exhibiting a highly frustrated and an ideal funnel-like energy landscape.

[1]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Energetic frustration and the nature of the transition state ensemble in protein folding , 2000 .

[2]  David J. Wales,et al.  Free energy landscapes of model peptides and proteins , 2003 .

[3]  C. Brooks,et al.  Thermodynamics of protein folding: A statistical mechanical study of a small all-β protein , 1997 .

[4]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Tamiki Komatsuzaki,et al.  How many dimensions are required to approximate the potential energy landscape of a model protein? , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  C. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the folding free energy surface of a three-helix bundle protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  David J. Wales,et al.  Energy Landscape of a Model Protein , 1999, cond-mat/9904304.

[8]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[9]  A. R. Srinivasan,et al.  Quasi‐harmonic method for studying very low frequency modes in proteins , 1984, Biopolymers.

[10]  M. Karplus,et al.  The topology of multidimensional potential energy surfaces: Theory and application to peptide structure and kinetics , 1997 .

[11]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Metastability of the folded states of globular proteins. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Kinetics of protein folding: Nucleation mechanism, time scales, and pathways , 1995 .

[13]  M. Karplus,et al.  Hidden complexity of free energy surfaces for peptide (protein) folding. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Mark A. Miller,et al.  Archetypal energy landscapes , 1998, Nature.

[15]  J. Doye,et al.  Saddle Points and Dynamics of Lennard-Jones Clusters, Solids and Supercooled Liquids , 2001, cond-mat/0108310.

[16]  Sergei V. Krivov,et al.  Free energy disconnectivity graphs: Application to peptide models , 2002 .

[17]  R S Berry,et al.  Linking topography of its potential surface with the dynamics of folding of a protein model. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jonathan P. K. Doye,et al.  Stationary points and dynamics in high-dimensional systems , 2003 .

[19]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding of a de novo designed four-helix bundle protein. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  David J Wales,et al.  Effect of salt bridges on the energy landscape of a model protein. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  Scott Brown,et al.  Coarse-grained sequences for protein folding and design , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  F. Stillinger,et al.  Packing Structures and Transitions in Liquids and Solids , 1984, Science.

[23]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics , 2001 .