Classification of breast masses in ultrasonic B scans using Nakagami and K distributions

Classification of breast masses in greyscale ultrasound images is undertaken using a multiparameter approach. Five parameters reflecting the non-Rayleigh nature of the backscattered echo were used. These parameters, based mostly on the Nakagami and K distributions, were extracted from the envelope of the echoes at the site, boundary, spiculated region and shadow of the mass. They were combined to create a linear discriminant. The performance of this discriminant for the classification of breast masses was studied using a data set consisting of 70 benign and 29 malignant cases. The Az value for the discriminant was 0.96 +/- 0.02, showing great promise in the classification of masses into benign and malignant ones. The discriminant was combined with the level of suspicion values of the radiologist leading to an Az value of 0.97 +/- 0.014. The parameters used here can be calculated with minimal clinical intervention, so the method proposed here may therefore be easily implemented in an automated fashion. These results also support the recent reports suggesting that ultrasound may help as an adjunct to mammography in breast cancer diagnostics to enhance the classification of breast masses.

[1]  C. Metz.  Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[2]  E A Sickles,et al.  Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis. , 1984, Radiology.

[3]  P Ducimetière,et al.  Comparison of receiver operating curves derived from the same population: a bootstrapping approach. , 1985, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[4]  G. Leopold,et al.  Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  A. Lopes,et al.  A statistical and geometrical edge detector for SAR images , 1988 .

[7]  J.M. Reid,et al.  Use of non-Rayleigh statistics for the identification of tumors in ultrasonic B-scans of the breast , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  S C Horii,et al.  Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging.

[9]  C. Oliver.  Optimum texture estimators for SAR clutter , 1993 .

[10]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Linear Combinations of Multiple Diagnostic Markers , 1993 .

[11]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound Echo Envelope Analysis Using a Homodyned K Distribution Signal Model , 1994 .

[12]  D. Blacknell,et al.  Comparison of parameter estimators for K-distribution , 1994 .

[13]  P M Shankar,et al.  A model for ultrasonic scattering from tissues based on the K distribution. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Keith P. B. Thomson,et al.  The ratio of the arithmetic to the geometric mean: a first-order statistical test for multilook SAR image homogeneity , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  G. Rizzatto,et al.  High-resolution sonography of breast carcinoma. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Women at high risk for breast cancer. , 1998, The American journal of nursing.

[19]  Geoffrey Edwards,et al.  On nonparametric edge detection in multilook SAR images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Routine receiver operating characteristic analysis in mammography as a measure of radiologists' performance. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  F. Forsberg,et al.  Analysis and classification of tissue with scatterer structure templates , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Estimation of the parameters of the K-distribution using higher order and fractional moments [radar clutter] , 1999 .

[24]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[26]  I Zuna,et al.  Relevance of sonographic B-mode criteria and computer-aided ultrasonic tissue characterization in differential/diagnosis of solid breast masses. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  P. Shankar.  A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues , 2000 .

[28]  G Berger,et al.  Computerized ultrasound B-scan characterization of breast nodules. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  P M Shankar,et al.  Use of the K-distribution for classification of breast masses. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  Milan Sonka,et al.  "Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 2. Medical Image Processing and Analysis " , 2000 .

[31]  F. Forsberg,et al.  Tissue characterization using the continuous wavelet transform. II. Application on breast RF data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[32]  Iain H. Woodhouse,et al.  The ratio of the arithmetic to the geometric mean: a cross-entropy interpretation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  A. Stavros,et al.  Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. , 2001, Radiology.

[34]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  V.A. Dumane,et al.  Use of frequency diversity and Nakagami statistics in ultrasonic tissue characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[36]  P M Shankar,et al.  Computer aided classification of masses in ultrasonic mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[37]  L. Irwig,et al.  Accuracy of combined breast imaging in young women. , 2002, Breast.

[38]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Classification of breast masses in ultrasonic B-mode images using a compounding technique in the Nakagami distribution domain. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  Tian Liu,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions using a multifeature analysis procedure , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[40]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses. , 2002, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[41]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  A Theoretical Study on Six Classifier Fusion Strategies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[42]  Ming-Feng Hou,et al.  Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  J.M. Reid,et al.  Classification of ultrasonic B mode images of the breast using frequency diversity and Nakagami statistics , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[44]  Athina P. Petropulu,et al.  Breast tissue characterization based on modeling of ultrasonic echoes using the power-law shot noise model , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[45]  D. G. Brennan,et al.  Linear diversity combining techniques , 2003 .

[46]  J.M. Reid,et al.  Computer-aided classification of breast masses in ultrasonic B-scans using a multiparameter approach , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.