Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation.

Studies with patients and functional magnetic resonance imaging investigations have demonstrated that the cerebellum plays an essential role in adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation. To identify cerebellar structures involved in the two tasks, we studied 19 patients with focal lesions after cerebellar infarction. Focal lesions were manually traced on magnetic resonance images and normalized using a new spatially unbiased template of the cerebellum. In addition, we reanalyzed data from 14 patients with cerebellar degeneration using voxel-based morphometry. We found that adjacent regions with only little overlap in the anterior arm area (lobules IV to VI) are important for adaptation in both tasks. Although adaptation to the force field task lay more anteriorly (lobules IV and V), lobule VI was more important for the visuomotor task. In addition, regions in the posterolateral cerebellum (Crus I and II) contributed to both tasks. No consistent involvement of the posterior arm region (lobule VIII) was found. Independence of the two kinds of adaptation is further supported by findings that performance in one task did not correlate to performance in the other task. Our results show that the anterior arm area of the cerebellum is functionally divided into a more posterior part of lobule VI, extending into lobule V, related to visuomotor adaption, and a more anterior part including lobules IV and V, related to force field adaption. The posterolateral cerebellum may process common aspects of both tasks.

[1]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Konczak,et al.  The effect of damage to the cerebellum on sensorimotor and cognitive function in children and adolescents , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  Laura Petrosini,et al.  A century of cerebellar somatotopy: a debated representation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[5]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Baizer,et al.  Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  F. Sultan,et al.  Functional localization in the cerebellum , 2011, Cortex.

[8]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  H. Tohgi,et al.  Cerebellar Infarction: Clinical and Neuroimaging Analysis in 293 Patients , 1993, Stroke.

[10]  J. Schmahmann,et al.  The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Adaptation to lateral displacement of vision in patients with lesions of the central nervous system , 1983, Neurology.

[12]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  L. Baliko,et al.  Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia , 2006, Neurology.

[14]  D. Pélisson,et al.  Ipsidirectional impairment of prism adaptation after unilateral lesion of anterior cerebellum , 2005, Neurology.

[15]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Spatial Generalization from Learning Dynamics of Reaching Movements , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Ekerot,et al.  Parallel fiber receptive fields: a key to understanding cerebellar operation and learning , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[17]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  James R. Bloedel,et al.  Cerebellar Afferent Systems , 2011 .

[19]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Supplementary Information: Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial behavior of Adaptive Systems that Learn with Basis Functions , 2003 .

[20]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[22]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  D. Timmann,et al.  Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  A. Brodal,et al.  Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine , 1950 .

[25]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. Erb,et al.  Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning Dynamics of Reaching , 2005 .

[30]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Dynamic Changes in Brain Activity during Prism Adaptation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  D C Noll,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of motor acquisition and motor transfer. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Adam Possner,et al.  Cerebellum , 2012, Neurology.

[33]  K. Furie,et al.  Functional Recovery After Rehabilitation for Cerebellar Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[34]  Chris Rorden,et al.  An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning , 2004, Machine Learning.

[36]  M. Garwicz,et al.  Micro-organisation of cerebellar modules controlling forelimb movements. , 2000, Progress in brain research.

[37]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[38]  N Ramnani,et al.  A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum , 2009, NeuroImage.

[39]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study , 1995, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Learning-related fMRI activation associated with a rotational visuo-motor transformation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  Volker Aurich,et al.  Probabilistic 3D MRI atlas of the human cerebellar dentate/interposed nuclei , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  P. Strick,et al.  Cerebellar Loops with Motor Cortex and Prefrontal Cortex of a Nonhuman Primate , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  T. Ebner,et al.  Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Gary C. Sing,et al.  Reduction in Learning Rates Associated with Anterograde Interference Results from Interactions between Different Timescales in Motor Adaptation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  W. Ilg,et al.  Current advances in lesion-symptom mapping of the human cerebellum , 2009, Neuroscience.

[48]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Disruption of Primary Motor Cortex before Learning Impairs Memory of Movement Dynamics , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Impairments of prehension kinematics and grasping forces in patients with cerebellar degeneration and the relationship to cerebellar atrophy , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[51]  D Timmann,et al.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  The rate of visuomotor adaptation correlates with cerebellar white‐matter microstructure , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[53]  Jeremy D. Schmahmann,et al.  Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[55]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum , 2006, NeuroImage.

[57]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Impairment of Retention But Not Acquisition of a Visuomotor Skill Through Time-Dependent Disruption of Primary Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Richard Apps,et al.  Cerebellar cortical organization: a one-map hypothesis , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Imaging the deep cerebellar nuclei: A probabilistic atlas and normalization procedure , 2011, NeuroImage.

[60]  W. Graf,et al.  Cerebellar inputs to intraparietal cortex areas LIP and MIP: functional frameworks for adaptive control of eye movements, reaching, and arm/eye/head movement coordination. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  H. Karnath,et al.  The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[63]  Eilon Vaadia,et al.  Motor Cortex in Voluntary Movements: A Distributed System for Distributed Functions , 2007 .

[64]  H. Karnath,et al.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.