The lighting of the BECONs: A behavioral data science approach to tracking interventions in COVID-19 research

The imposition of lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 outbreak has underscored the importance of human behavior in mitigating virus transmission. Scientific study ofinterventions designed to change behavior (e.g., to promote social distancing) requiresmeasures of effectiveness that are fast, that can be assessed through experiments, and that can be investigated without actual virus transmission. This paper presents a methodological approach designed to deliver such indicators. We show that behavioral data, obtainable through tracing apps currently in development, can be used to assess a central concept in epidemiology known as the contact network: a network representation that encodes which individuals have been in physical proximity long enough to transmit the virus. Because behavioral interventions alter the contact network, a comparison of contact networks before and after the intervention can provide information on the effectiveness of the intervention. We coin indicators based on this idea Behavioral Contact Network (BECON) indicators. We examine the performance of three indicators: the Density BECON (based on differences in network density), the Spectral BECON (based on differences in the eigenvector of the adjacency matrix), and the ASPL BECON (based on differences in average shortest path lengths). Using simulations, we show that all three indicators can effectively track the effect of behavioral interventions. Even in conditions with significant amounts of noise, BECON indicators can reliably identify and order effect sizes of interventions. The present paper invites further study of the method as well as practical implementations to test the validity of BECON indicators in real data.

[1]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The Lighting of the BECONs , 2022, Journal of Behavioral Data Science.

[2]  T. Peto,et al.  Effect of Covid-19 Vaccination on Transmission of Alpha and Delta Variants , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Promoting physical distancing during COVID-19: a systematic approach to compare behavioral interventions , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Sandra J. Geiger,et al.  Smart Distance Lab’s art fair, experimental data on social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Scientific data.

[5]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Quantifying agent impacts on contact sequences in social interactions , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[6]  L. Coffeng,et al.  Achieving herd immunity against COVID-19 at the country level by the exit strategy of a phased lift of control , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe , 2020, Nature.

[8]  Isabel J. Raabe,et al.  Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[9]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[10]  Don Klinkenberg,et al.  Incubation period of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among travellers from Wuhan, China, 20–28 January 2020 , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[11]  Edoardo M. Airoldi,et al.  Stacking models for nearly optimal link prediction in complex networks , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Timothy F. Leslie,et al.  Complexity of the Basic Reproduction Number (R0) , 2019, Emerging infectious diseases.

[13]  G. Grimmett,et al.  Probability on Graphs: Random Processes on Graphs and Lattices , 2018 .

[14]  Egon Friedell,et al.  The Incubation Period , 2017 .

[15]  Palash Goyal,et al.  Graph Embedding Techniques, Applications, and Performance: A Survey , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[16]  Ksenia D. Mukhina,et al.  Mobile Contacts Network Reconstruction Using Call Domain Records Data , 2016, 2016 Third European Network Intelligence Conference (ENIC).

[17]  Jeffrey M Drazen,et al.  Ebola and quarantine. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  P. V. Mieghem,et al.  Performance Analysis of Complex Networks and Systems , 2014 .

[19]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Predicting the Vulnerability of Great Apes to Disease: The Role of Superspreaders and Their Potential Vaccination , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  Lars Tummers,et al.  Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[21]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Generalized Epidemic Mean-Field Model for Spreading Processes Over Multilayer Complex Networks , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[22]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Robustness envelopes of networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[23]  P. V. Mieghem,et al.  Non-Markovian Infection Spread Dramatically Alters the Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible Epidemic Threshold in Networks , 2013 .

[24]  D. Stevanović,et al.  Decreasing the spectral radius of a graph by link removals. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[26]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[27]  P Van Mieghem,et al.  Accuracy criterion for the mean-field approximation in susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemics on networks. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .