A GIS-based approach for gully erosion susceptibility modelling: a test in Sicily, Italy

The aim of this study is to analyze the susceptibility conditions to gully erosion phenomena in the Magazzolo River basin and to test a method that allows for driving the factors selection. The study area is one of the largest (225 km2) watershed of southern Sicily and it is mostly characterized by gentle slopes carved into clayey and evaporitic sediments, except for the northern sector where carbonatic rocks give rise to steep slopes. In order to obtain a quantitative evaluation of gully erosion susceptibility, statistical relationships between the spatial distributions of gullies affecting the area and a set of twelve environmental variables were analyzed. Stereoscopic analysis of aerial photographs dated 2000, and field surveys carried out in 2006, allowed us to map about a thousand landforms produced by linear water erosion processes, classifiable as ephemeral and permanent gullies. The linear density of the gullies, computed on each of the factors classes, was assumed as the function expressing the susceptibility level of the latter. A 40-m digital elevation model (DEM) prepared from 1:10,000-scale topographic maps was used to compute the values of nine topographic attributes (primary: slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, general curvature, tangential curvature; secondary: stream power index; topographic wetness index; LS-USLE factor); from available thematic maps and field checks three other physical attributes (lithology, soil texture, land use) were derived. For each of these variables, a 40-m grid layer was generated, reclassifying the topographic variables according to their standard deviation values. In order to evaluate the controlling role of the selected predictive variables, one-variable susceptibility models, based on the spatial relationships between each single factor and gullies, were produced and submitted to a validation procedure. The latter was carried out by evaluating the predictive performance of models trained on one half of the landform archive and tested on the other. Large differences of accuracy were verified by computing geometric indexes of the validation curves (prediction and success rate curves; ROC curves) drawn for each one-variable model; in particular, soil texture, general curvature and aspect demonstrated a weak or a null influence on the spatial distribution of gullies within the studied area, while, on the contrary, tangential curvature, stream power index and plan curvature showed high predictive skills. Hence, predictive models were produced on a multi-variable basis, by variously combining the one-variable models. The validation of the multi-variables models, which generally indicated quite satisfactory results, were used as a sensitivity analysis tool to evaluate differences in the prediction results produced by changing the set of combined physical attributes. The sensitivity analysis pointed out that by increasing the number of combined environmental variables, an improvement of the susceptibility assessment is produced; this is true with the exception of adding to the multi-variables models a variable, as slope aspect, not correlated to the target variable. The addition of this attribute produces effects on the validation curves that are not distinguishable from noise and, as a consequence, the slope aspect was excluded from the final multi-variables model used to draw the gully erosion susceptibility map of the Magazzolo River basin. In conclusion, the research showed that the validation of one-variable models can be used as a tool for selecting factors to be combined to prepare the best performing multi-variables gully erosion susceptibility model.

[1]  Paolo Magliulo,et al.  Assessing the susceptibility to water-induced soil erosion using a geomorphological, bivariate statistics-based approach , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[2]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Terrain analysis : principles and applications , 2000 .

[4]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[5]  K. N. Tiwari,et al.  Determining the optimum cell size of digital elevation model for hydrologic application , 2011 .

[6]  L B Lusted,et al.  Radiographic applications of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. , 1974, Radiology.

[7]  I. Gibson Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology , 1976, Mineralogical Magazine.

[8]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Gis Technology in Mapping Landslide Hazard , 1995 .

[9]  D. Woodward,et al.  Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (EGEM) , 1988 .

[10]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  The role of the diagnostic areas in the assessment of landslide susceptibility models: a test in the sicilian chain , 2011 .

[11]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[12]  G. R. Foster,et al.  A Process-Based Soil Erosion Model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project Technology , 1989 .

[13]  B. Schröder,et al.  A functional entity approach to predict soil erosion processes in a small Plio-Pleistocene Mediterranean catchment in Northern Chianti, Italy , 2011 .

[14]  J. Poesen,et al.  Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs , 2003 .

[15]  Andrea G. Fabbri,et al.  Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping , 2003 .

[16]  Ángel M. Felicísimo,et al.  Modelling the occurrence of gullies in rangelands of southwest Spain , 2009 .

[17]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  Exporting a Google Earth™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[18]  Giuseppe Giordano,et al.  Isoerosivity and erosion risk map for Sicily , 1991 .

[19]  D. Costanzo,et al.  Slope units-based flow susceptibility model: using validation tests to select controlling factors , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[20]  D. Woodward,et al.  Method to predict cropland ephemeral gully erosion , 1999 .

[21]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains , 1965 .

[22]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  A. Clerici,et al.  A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method , 2002 .

[24]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  GIS analysis to assess landslide susceptibility in a fluvial basin of NW Sicily (Italy) , 2008 .

[25]  Federica Lucà,et al.  Comparison of GIS-based gullying susceptibility mapping using bivariate and multivariate statistics: Northern Calabria, South Italy , 2011 .

[26]  M. Conforti,et al.  Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy) , 2011 .

[27]  Ricco Rakotomalala,et al.  TANAGRA : un logiciel gratuit pour l'enseignement et la recherche , 2005, EGC.

[28]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Digital terrain analysis. , 2008 .

[29]  Jan Khre,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Information , 2012 .

[30]  Cristian S. Calude The mathematical theory of information , 2007 .

[31]  S. Schnabel,et al.  Using and comparing two nonparametric methods (CART and MARS) to model the potential distribution of gullies , 2009 .

[32]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Combined landslide inventory and susceptibility assessment based on different mapping units: an example from the Flemish Ardennes, Belgium , 2009 .

[33]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models , 2006 .

[34]  A. Capra,et al.  Application of the EGEM model to predict ephemeral gully erosion in Sicily, Italy , 2005 .

[35]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards , 2010 .

[36]  P. Frattini,et al.  Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment , 2008 .

[37]  Santiago Beguería,et al.  Validation and Evaluation of Predictive Models in Hazard Assessment and Risk Management , 2006 .

[38]  Gabriele Buttafuoco,et al.  Assessing spatial uncertainty in mapping soil erodibility factor using geostatistical stochastic simulation , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[39]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Use of terrain variables for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in Lebanon , 2007 .

[40]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  Soil erosion susceptibility assessment and validation using a geostatistical multivariate approach: a test in Southern Sicily , 2008 .

[41]  Aleksey Sidorchuk,et al.  Dynamic and static models of gully erosion , 1999 .

[42]  Giovanni B. Crosta,et al.  Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models , 2010 .