Does patenting increase the probability of being acquired? Evidence from cross-border and domestic acquisitions

A firm that owns a patent has a legal right to exclude. Applying for the patent, however, discloses discovery of an invention by the firm. Both the ownership of the right and the disclosure of the discovery expose the firm to an acquisition, because other firms may be interested in buying the right or the invention for a number of reasons. This idea of patent-driven mergers and acquisitions (M&As) is tested using a large sample of Finnish firms that are mostly private and small. It is found that patenting by a Finnish firm is positively correlated with the probability that the firm is acquired by a foreign firm.

[1]  Flexibility and competitiveness: Labour market flexibility, innovation and organisational performance : Finnish national report , 2003 .

[2]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[3]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[4]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Value Maximization and the Acquisition Process , 1988 .

[5]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[6]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The Acquisition of Technology and Small Firms by Large Firms , 1990 .

[7]  M. Rothschild,et al.  The Economics of Patents , 2002 .

[8]  Rita Asplund,et al.  Functional Flexibility Strategies: Evidence from Companies in Five Small European Economies , 2003 .

[9]  Erik Stafford,et al.  New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers , 2001 .

[10]  A. Dickerson,et al.  Takeover risk and the market for corporate control: the experience of British firms in the 1970s and 1980s , 2002 .

[11]  M. Mitchell,et al.  The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity , 1996 .

[12]  Finance of Small Bio-pharmaceutical Industry in Finland - Descriptive Analysis , 2004 .

[13]  T. Luukkonen.  VARIABILITY IN FORMS OF ORGANISATION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS , 2003 .

[14]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[15]  Ville Kaitila.  CONVERGENCE OF REAL GDP PER CAPITA IN THE EU15 HOW DO THE ACCESSION COUNTRIES FIT IN , 2003 .

[16]  Michael Gort,et al.  An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers , 1969 .

[17]  R. Powell,et al.  Modelling Takeover Likelihood , 1997 .

[18]  Jukka Jalava.  Electrifying and Digitalizing the Finnish Manufacturing Industry: Historical Notes of Diffusion and Productivity , 2003 .

[19]  J. Oksanen.  Knowledge and Learning in the Determination of the Optimal Form of Firm Organisation , 2003 .

[20]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[21]  R. Merges,et al.  The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry , 2003 .

[22]  H. Johnson,et al.  An analysis of secured debt , 1985 .

[23]  Antti-Jussi Tahvanainen.  The Capital Structure of Finnish Biotechnology SMEs - An empirical analysisi , 2003 .

[24]  W Marcy,et al.  Patent Licensing , 1982, Journal of dental research.

[25]  O’D,et al.  Patent Breadth , Patent Life , and the Pace of Technological Progress , 1998 .

[26]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Predicting takeover targets: A methodological and empirical analysis , 1986 .

[27]  H. Manne,et al.  Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The free-rider problem and the theory of the corporation , 1980 .

[29]  Ari Hyytinen,et al.  Could Mr. and Mrs. Capital Market Imperfection Please Step Forward? An Empirical Analysis of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in Capital Markets , 2004 .

[30]  E. Ofek,et al.  Bustup Takeover of Value-Destroying Diversified Firms , 1994 .

[31]  Stefano Rossi,et al.  Cross-Country Determinants of Mergers and Acquisitions , 2003 .

[32]  P. Goldberg,et al.  The Effects of the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency Standards , 1996 .

[33]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[34]  D. Neven,et al.  Technology Sourcing and FDI in the EC: An Empirical Evaluation , 1995 .

[35]  Erik Stafford,et al.  Investigating the Economic Role of Mergers , 1999 .

[36]  K. Arrow.  Vertical integration and communication , 1975 .

[37]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Investor Protection and Corporate Governance , 1999 .