Coupled Fire/Evacuation Analysis of the Station Nightclub Fire

In this paper, coupled fire and evacuation simulation tools are used to simulate the Station Nightclub fire. This study differs from the analysis conducted by NIST in three key areas; (1) an enhanced flame spread model and (2) a toxicity generation model are used, (3) the evacuation is coupled to the fire simulation. Predicted early burning locations in the full-scale fire simulation are in line with photographic evidence and the predicted onset of flashover is similar to that produced by NIST. However, it is suggested that both predictions of the flashover time are approximately 15 sec earlier than actually occurred. Three evacuation scenarios are then considered, two of which are coupled with the fire simulation. The coupled fire and evacuation simulation suggests that 180 fatalities result from a building population of 460. With a 15 sec delay in the fire timeline, the evacuation simulation produces 84 fatalities which are in good agreement with actual number of fatalities. An important observation resulting from this work is that traditional fire engineering ASET/RSET calculations which do not couple the fire and evacuation simulations have the potential to be considerably over optimistic in terms of the level of safety achieved by building designs.

[1]  Daniel M. Madrzykowski,et al.  Reconstructing the Station Nightclub Fire: Computer Modeling of the Fire Growth and Spread | NIST , 2007 .

[2]  Craig Beyler Toxicity Assessment Of Products Of Combustion Of Flexible Polyurethane Foam , 2005 .

[3]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Modelling occupant interaction with fire conditions using the buildingEXODUS evacuation model , 2001 .

[4]  Daniel M. Madrzykowski,et al.  Report of the Technical Investigation of The Station Nightclub Fire (NIST NCSTAR 2) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | NIST , 2005 .

[5]  B. Hjertager,et al.  On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion , 1977 .

[6]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Fire dynamics simulator (version 4) :: user's guide , 2004 .

[7]  E. Galea,et al.  Predicting toxic gas concentrations resulting from enclosure fires using local equivalence ratio concept linked to fire field models , 2007 .

[8]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Parallel CFD fire modelling on office PCs with dynamic load balancing , 2007 .

[9]  A. Tewarson Generation of Heat and Chemical Compounds in Fires , 2002 .

[10]  D. Purser Toxic product yields and hazard assessment for fully enclosed design fires , 2000 .

[11]  V. Babrauskas Heat Release In Fires , 1990 .

[12]  Fuchen Jia,et al.  CFD fire simulation of the Swissair Flight 111 in-flight fire – Part II: Fire spread analysis , 2004, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[13]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Experiments and Modeling of Multiple Workstations Burning in a Compartment. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-5E) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | NIST , 2005 .