Hot workability analysis of extruded AZ magnesium alloys with processing maps

Abstract The processing conditions applied to deform wrought magnesium alloys greatly affect their final microstructure and mechanical properties. Defining an applicable processing window in terms of the ranges of temperatures and strain rates to achieve a homogeneous microstructure is a prerequisite for process optimization, since magnesium alloys show a peculiar deformation behaviour. By using trustworthy input data from uniaxial hot compression tests, processing maps were constructed for the alloys AZ41, AZ61 and AZ80. These maps clearly indicate the conditions leading to dynamically recrystallized homogeneous microstructures after hot deformation, as verified by analysing the microstructures after hot deformation under different conditions. It is found that a strain rate of 5 s −1 and a temperature of 375 °C for AZ41 and 325 °C for both AZ61 and AZ80 would result in dynamically recrystallized homogeneous microstructures.

[1]  Kun Wu,et al.  Processing maps for hot working of ZK60 magnesium alloy , 2007 .

[2]  Y. Prasad,et al.  Modelling of hot deformation for microstructural control , 1998 .

[3]  M. Barnett.  Influence of deformation conditions and texture on the high temperature flow stress of magnesium AZ31 , 2001 .

[4]  K. P. Rao,et al.  Hot Deformation Mechanisms and Microstructural Control in High‐Temperature Extruded AZ31 Magnesium Alloy , 2007 .

[5]  R. Kaibyshev,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC TEXTURE ON DYNAMIC RECRYSTALLIZATION , 1999 .

[6]  K. P. Rao,et al.  Processing maps for hot deformation of rolled AZ31 magnesium alloy plate: Anisotropy of hot workability , 2008 .

[7]  L. Katgerman,et al.  Strain-dependent constitutive analysis of three wrought Mg–Al–Zn alloys , 2008, Journal of Materials Science.

[8]  H. Mcqueen,et al.  Microstructural development in Mg alloy AZ31 during hot working , 1997 .

[9]  Jie Zhou,et al.  Determination of a constitutive relationship for AZ31B magnesium alloy and validation through comparison between simulated and real extrusion , 2006 .

[10]  S. Semiatin,et al.  The adiabatic correction factor for deformation heating during the uniaxial compression test , 2001 .

[11]  K. P. Rao,et al.  Hot working parameters and mechanisms in as-cast Mg–3Sn–1Ca alloy , 2008 .

[12]  Y. V. R. K. Prasad,et al.  Processing maps: A status report , 2003 .

[13]  Y. Prasad,et al.  Hot deformation behaviour of as-cast Mg–2Zn–1Mn alloy in compression: a study with processing map , 2003 .

[14]  L. Katgerman,et al.  Constitutive analysis of wrought magnesium alloy Mg–Al4–Zn1 , 2007 .

[15]  J. Robson,et al.  Review on Research and Development of Magnesium Alloys , 2008 .

[16]  Yellapregeda Prasad V.R.K.,et al.  Hot Working Guide: A Compendium of Processing Maps , 1997 .

[17]  M. Barnett,et al.  Influence of grain size on hot working stresses and microstructures in Mg-3Al-1Zn , 2004 .

[18]  H. J. McQueen,et al.  Constitutive analysis in hot working , 2002 .

[19]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Behaviour of AZ31 magnesium alloy during compression at elevated temperatures , 2005 .

[20]  F. J. Humphreys,et al.  Dynamic recrystallisation and the development of microstructure during the high temperature deformation of magnesium , 1982 .

[21]  D. Willis,et al.  Measurement of grain size using the circle intercept method , 1987 .

[22]  Y. Prasad,et al.  Hot deformation behaviour of Mg–3Al alloy—A study using processing map , 2008 .

[23]  K. Kainer,et al.  Enhancement of Workability in AZ31 Alloy – Processing Maps: Part I, Cast Material , 2006 .