Correlates of fertility issues in an Internet survey of cancer survivors

Purpose. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine what young cancer survivors know about the effect of their cancer on fertility, how fertility difficulties affected their lives and whether they would opt for fertility preservation (FP) and (2) to assess the sources of information and the helpfulness of them. Methods. Women of at least 18 years with cancer affecting reproductive function were recruited from eight cancer websites for this online survey. The Cancer and Fertility Survey (CFS) contained items from validated inventories and items to assess fertility issues in cancer patients. Quantitative analyses (t-tests, χ2, analysis of variance) and thematic analysis of free text data were performed. Results. Of the 80 participating women, 68.1% rated the risk of infertility as high. The mean number of professionals consulted was 3.56 (SD = 2.7), but 20% of women had not discussed fertility with any professional. The weighted mean helpfulness index was the highest for spouses and oncologists. Strength of positive attitudes towards FP was significantly greater than that of negative attitudes. Conclusion. The need to discuss fertility is high among women searching for information on cancer websites. Options to preserve fertility were positively viewed but the actual use may be limited by concerns about safety.

[1]  S. Klock,et al.  Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  S. Tschudin,et al.  Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. , 2009, Human reproduction update.

[3]  V. Kraaij,et al.  Coping, Goal Adjustment, and Positive and Negative Affect in Definitive Infertility , 2009, Journal of health psychology.

[4]  L. Schmidt.  Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction–what are the research priorities? , 2009, Human fertility.

[5]  T. Wischmann.  Implications of psychosocial support in infertility – a critical appraisal , 2008, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  J. Boivin,et al.  Decision-making about seeking medical advice in an internet sample of women trying to get pregnant. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[7]  Tara M Cousineau,et al.  Psychological impact of infertility. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[8]  R. Seufert,et al.  The effect of cancer treatment on female fertility and strategies for preserving fertility. , 2007, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[9]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Interpreting the international trends in testicular seminoma and nonseminoma incidence , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[10]  J. Donnez,et al.  Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[11]  J. Panepinto,et al.  Attitudes Regarding Fertility Preservation in Female Adolescent Cancer Patients , 2006, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[12]  E. Sartori,et al.  Preservation of ovarian function, reproductive ability and emotional attitudes in patients with malignant ovarian tumors. , 2005, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  M. Friedlander,et al.  Fertility- and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Richard A. Anderson,et al.  Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  F. Kraaimaat,et al.  Predicting Emotional Response to Unsuccessful Fertility Treatment: A Prospective Study , 2005, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[16]  M. Clark,et al.  Discussions regarding reproductive health for young women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  E. Winer,et al.  Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  L. Zeltzer,et al.  Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer , 2004, Psycho-oncology.

[19]  J. Boivin.  A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[20]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Current Internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[21]  M. Friedlander,et al.  The fertility‐ and menopause‐related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of breast cancer: A qualitative study , 2003, Psycho-oncology.

[22]  T. Hartge,et al.  Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology , 2003 .

[23]  Sarah Bauerle Bass.  How will Internet Use Affect the Patient? A Review of Computer Network and Closed Internet-based System Studies and the Implications in Understanding How the Use of the Internet Affects Patient Populations , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[24]  M. Coleman,et al.  Cancer prevalence in European registry areas. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  L. Schover,et al.  Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  S. Steginga,et al.  Young women's experience of breast cancer: defining young and identifying concerns , 2000, Psycho-oncology.

[27]  L. Schover,et al.  Having children after cancer , 1999, Cancer.

[28]  L. Schover.  Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. , 1999, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[29]  R. Nachtigall,et al.  'Born to be a mother': the cultural construction of risk in infertility treatment in the U.S. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[30]  R. Edelmann,et al.  Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a gender comparison. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[31]  T. Marteau,et al.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). , 1992, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[32]  E. Freeman,et al.  Perceptions of infertility and treatment stress in females as compared with males entering in vitro fertilization treatment. , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[33]  A. Greil,et al.  INFERTILITY: , 1988 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[35]  I. Rosenstock.  Why people use health services. , 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[36]  L. Lechner,et al.  Definite involuntary childlessness: associations between coping, social support and psychological distress. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[37]  S. S. Kim.  Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: current developments and future directions. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[38]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Age-incidence relationships and time trends in cervical cancer in Sweden , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.