Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS

Two image datasets (one thick section dataset and another volumetric dataset) were typically reconstructed from each single CT projection data. The volumetric dataset was stored in a mini-PACS with 271-Gb online and 680-Gb nearline storage and routed to radiologists’ workstations, whereas the thick section dataset was stored in the main PACS. Over a 5-month sample period, 278 Gb of CT data (8976 examinations) was stored in the main PACS, and 738 Gb of volumetric datasets (6193 examinations) was stored in the mini-PACS. The volumetric datasets formed 32.8% of total data for all modalities (2.20 Tb) in the main PACS and mini-PACS combined. At the end of this period, the volumetric datasets of 1892 and 5162 examinations were kept online and nearline, respectively. Mini-PACS offers an effective method of archiving every volumetric dataset and delivering it to radiologists.

[1]  Janice Honeyman-Buck,et al.  Storage and Database , 2000 .

[2]  Kevin McEnery,et al.  Impact of multislice CT on PACS resources. , 2002, Journal of digital imaging.

[3]  W A Kalender,et al.  [The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging]. , 2003, Der Radiologe.

[4]  David S Channin Integrating the healthcare enterprise: a primer. Part 6: the fellowship of IHE: year 4 additions and extensions. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  G. Rubin,et al.  Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. , 2000, European journal of radiology.