Institutional isomorphism and change: the national programme for IT – 10 years on

Institutional isomorphism has been a major intellectual contribution within institutional theory for three decades. The effects and processes of institutionalization have traditionally focused on stability and persistence of institutions, and more recently on institutional change. This study contributes to the IS field using the lens of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphism and change within a highly institutionalized organizational field of health care. The setting is the National Health Service in the United Kingdom, where in 2002 a major government policy was launched to introduce Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to over 50 million citizens. Using episodic interviewing techniques and content analysis of government health IT policy documents, this study provides a longitudinal analysis of the introduction of government policy to modernize health care using information technology. Institutional isomorphic conditions become conflicted with attempts to impose field and organizational change. As clinicians attempt to retain their professional dominance in a climate of almost continuous restructuring of health services, political initiatives to implement EHRs are met with resistance from key stakeholders, resulting in policy changes and further delayed implementation times.

[1]  Zbigniew H. Przasnyski,et al.  On Information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[2]  A. Hindle,et al.  A Multi‐disciplinary Identification of Issues Associated with ‘Contracting’ in Market‐oriented Health Service Reforms , 1997 .

[3]  J. Stockman,et al.  Challenges to Implementing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT): A Qualitative Study , 2007 .

[4]  Jane Hendy,et al.  Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Annabelle L. Mark,et al.  Modernising healthcare – is the NPfIT for purpose? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[7]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  ‘The biggest computer programme in the world…ever!’: time for a change in mindset? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[9]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[10]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizational Frame Bending: Principles for Managing Reorientation , 1989 .

[11]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  R. Hanka,et al.  Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges , 1998, BMJ.

[13]  T. Reay,et al.  The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta , 2005 .

[14]  Mark Christopher Shaw,et al.  On Quality and Communication: The Relevance of Critical Theory to Health Informatics , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  A. Kenny,et al.  Medical Dominance And Power: A Rural Perspective , 2004 .

[16]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Unreasonable expectations – NHS IT, Greek choruses and the games institutions play around mega-programmes , 2007 .

[17]  Nicola Evans Integrating healthcare with information and communications technology Wendy Currie Integrating healthcare with information and communications technology David Finnegan (Eds) Radcliffe Publishing 274pp £29.99 978 1 84619 300 2 1846193001 [Formula: see text]. , 2010, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[18]  Angus Laing,et al.  Political Exhortation, Patient Expectation and Professional Execution: Perspectives on the Consumerization of Health Care , 2002 .

[19]  W. Currie TEMPEST: An integrative model for health technology assessment , 2012 .

[20]  Jeffrey Q. Barden,et al.  Cognitive Underpinnings of Institutional Persistence and Change: A Framing Perspective , 2006 .

[21]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[22]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Tim Benson,et al.  Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not—Part 2: scalability , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[25]  M. Fennell The effects of environmental characteristics on the structure of hospital clusters. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[26]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[27]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Process Transformation: Limitations to Radical Organizational Change within Public Service Organizations , 2004 .

[28]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies , 2000 .

[29]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  D. Light,et al.  NHS plc: The Privatisation of Our Health Care , 2006 .

[31]  Brian Randell A computer scientist's reactions to NPfIT , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  G. Veigh,et al.  Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care , 1971 .

[33]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[34]  Amer A. Kaissi,et al.  Fads, fashions, and bandwagons in health care strategy , 2008, Health care management review.

[35]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  The Clinical Impact of eHealth on the Self-Management of Diabetes: A Double Adoption Perspective , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Sharing clinical data electronically: a critical challenge for fixing the health care system. , 2012, JAMA.

[37]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  The Role of Information Systems in the UK National Health Service: Action at a Distance and the Fetish of Calculation , 1991 .

[38]  Sean Brennan,et al.  The biggest computer programme in the world ever! How's it going? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[39]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Organizational Culture-Based Theory of Clinical Information Systems Implementation in Hospitals , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Sten Jönsson Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[41]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  The organizing vision of application service provision: a process-oriented analysis , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[42]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[43]  Tim Benson,et al.  Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not—Part 1: incentives , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory , 1996 .

[45]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care , 1971 .

[46]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  In Pursuit of the Re‐Engineering Agenda in Public Administration , 1997 .

[47]  Rob Procter,et al.  The Development of Data Infrastructures for eHealth: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Ken Eason,et al.  Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS National Programme for Information Technology , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[49]  Y Frankl,et al.  How’s It Going? , 2007 .

[50]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion , 2009, MIS Q..

[51]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL JOLTS AND INDUSTRY REVOLUTIONS: ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO DISCONTINUOUS CHANGE , 1990 .

[52]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[53]  A. Hassey The National Programme for IT in the NHS. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[54]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.