Effect of Arched Leaflets and Stent Profile on the Hemodynamics of Tri-Leaflet Flexible Polymeric Heart Valves

Polymeric heart valves (PHV) can be engineered to serve as alternatives for existing prosthetic valves due to higher durability and hemodynamics similar to bioprosthetic valves. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of geometry on PHVs coaptation and hemodynamic performance. The two geometric factors considered are stent profile and leaflet arch length, which were varied across six valve configurations. Three models were created with height to diameter ratio of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.88. The other three models were designed by altering arch height to stent diameter ratio, to be 0, 0.081, and 0.116. Particle image velocimetry experiments were conducted on each PHV to characterize velocity, vorticity, turbulent characteristics, effective orifice area, and regurgitant fraction. This study revealed that the presence of arches as well as higher stent profile reduced regurgitant flow down to 5%, while peak systole downstream velocity reduced to 58% and Reynolds Shear Stress values reduced 40%. Further, earlier reattachment of the forward flow jet was observed in PHVs with leaflet arches. These findings indicate that although both geometric factors help diminish the commissural gap during diastole, leaflet arches induce a larger jet opening, yielding to earlier flow reattachment and lower energy dissipation.

[1]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.

[2]  D. Tritton,et al.  Physical Fluid Dynamics , 1977 .

[3]  M Jones,et al.  In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  Todd D. Giorgio,et al.  Studies on the Mechanisms of Shear-Induced Platelet Activation , 1987 .

[5]  K. Chandran,et al.  In vitro comparison of velocity profiles and turbulent shear distal to polyurethane trileaflet and pericardial prosthetic valves. , 1989, Artificial organs.

[6]  H. Reul,et al.  Estimation of Shear Stress-related Blood Damage in Heart Valve Prostheses - in Vitro Comparison of 25 Aortic Valves , 1990, The International journal of artificial organs.

[7]  M. Thubrikar.  The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[8]  J. Wilson,et al.  Severe hemolysis after incomplete mitral valve repair. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  R. R. Wolfe,et al.  Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Results of treatment of patients with ventricular septal defects. , 1993, Circulation.

[10]  F. R. Rosendaal,et al.  Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses , 1994, Circulation.

[11]  J D Thomas,et al.  Mechanisms of hemolysis with mitral prosthetic regurgitation. Study using transesophageal echocardiography and fluid dynamic simulation. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Velocity measurements and flow patterns within the hinge region of a Medtronic Parallel bileaflet mechanical valve with clear housing. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[13]  A. Melling.  Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[14]  M. Kotler,et al.  Evaluation of hemolysis in patients with prosthetic heart valves , 1998, Clinical cardiology.

[15]  V T Turitto,et al.  Mechanical factors affecting hemostasis and thrombosis. , 1998, Thrombosis research.

[16]  D. Ku,et al.  Fluid mechanics of vascular systems, diseases, and thrombosis. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  A comparison of the hinge and near-hinge flow fields of the St Jude medical hemodynamic plus and regent bileaflet mechanical heart valves. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  H T Low,et al.  Pulsatile flow studies of a porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: PIV measurements and shear-induced blood damage. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  John O. Dabiri,et al.  Starting flow through nozzles with temporally variable exit diameter , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  J. Gardin,et al.  Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study , 2006, The Lancet.

[21]  Hwa Liang Leo,et al.  Fluid Dynamic Assessment of Three Polymeric Heart Valves Using Particle Image Velocimetry , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  P. Wolf,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2006, Circulation.

[23]  M. Ruel,et al.  Very Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses in Adults <60 Years of Age , 2007, Circulation.

[24]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Characterization of Hemodynamic Forces Induced by Mechanical Heart Valves: Reynolds vs. Viscous Stresses , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Danny Bluestein,et al.  Fluid mechanics of arterial stenosis: Relationship to the development of mural thrombus , 1997, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Hélène A. Simon,et al.  Vorticity dynamics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an axisymmetric aorta , 2007 .

[27]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Platelet Activation Due to Hemodynamic Shear Stresses: Damage Accumulation Model and Comparison to In Vitro Measurements , 2008, ASAIO journal.

[28]  Hélène A. Simon,et al.  FLUID MECHANICS OF ARTIFICIAL HEART VALVES , 2009, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[29]  C. Vosa,et al.  Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  M. Gladwin,et al.  Elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease: association with hemolysis and hemoglobin oxygen desaturation , 2008, Haematologica.

[31]  Eli J. Weinberg,et al.  Hemodynamic Environments from Opposing Sides of Human Aortic Valve Leaflets Evoke Distinct Endothelial Phenotypes In Vitro , 2010, Cardiovascular engineering.

[32]  K. Fukamachi,et al.  Transcatheter heart valve with variable geometric configuration: in vitro evaluation. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[33]  A. Pasquet,et al.  The prevalence of cardiac dysfunction and the correlation with poor functioning among the very elderly. , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[34]  Nikolay V. Vasilyev,et al.  In Vitro Characterization of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Hemodynamics Using Particle Image Velocimetry , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Emerging Trends in Heart Valve Engineering: Part I. Solutions for Future , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Marcio Forleo,et al.  Hemocompatibility and Hemodynamics of Novel Hyaluronan–Polyethylene Materials for Flexible Heart Valve Leaflets , 2014, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[37]  Khandakar Niaz Morshed,et al.  Theory to Predict Shear Stress on Cells in Turbulent Blood Flow , 2014, PloS one.

[38]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  AHA Statistical Update Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2012 Update A Report From the American Heart Association WRITING GROUP MEMBERS , 2010 .

[39]  Reynolds shear stress for textile prosthetic heart valves in relation to fabric design. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[40]  M. DeBaun,et al.  Elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity, reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and mortality in adults with sickle cell disease , 2017, American journal of hematology.