System-Independent Characterization of Materials Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

We present a new decomposition approach for dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) called SIRZ that provides precise and accurate material description, independent of the scanner, over diagnostic energy ranges (30 to 200 keV). System independence is achieved by explicitly including a scanner-specific spectral description in the decomposition method, and a new X-ray-relevant feature space. The feature space consists of electron density, ρe, and a new effective atomic number, Ze, which is based on published X-ray cross sections. Reference materials are used in conjunction with the system spectral response so that additional beam-hardening correction is not necessary. The technique is tested against other methods on DECT data of known specimens scanned by diverse spectra and systems. Uncertainties in accuracy and precision are less than 3% and 2% respectively for the (ρe, Ze) results compared to prior methods that are inaccurate and imprecise (over 9%).

[1]  Stephen G. Azevedo,et al.  Nuclear-spectroscopy based, first-generation, computerized tomography scanners , 1991 .

[2]  Harry E. Martz,et al.  Effects of powder morphology and particle size on CT number estimates , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Anil K. Jain.  Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[4]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. I. Phantom studies. , 1986, Medical physics.

[5]  Harry E. Martz,et al.  MicroCT: Automated Analysis of CT Reconstructed Data of Home Made Explosive Materials Using the Matlab MicroCT Analysis GUI , 2011 .

[6]  J S Kallman,et al.  Documentation of the LLNL, TAFB and TSLMicro-Computed-Tomography Systems , 2009 .

[7]  Stephen G. Azevedo,et al.  Computed tomography systems and their industrial applications , 1990 .

[9]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Density and atomic number measurements with spectral x-ray attenuation method , 2003 .

[10]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  A Parametric Level-Set Approach to Simultaneous Object Identification and Background Reconstruction for Dual-Energy Computed Tomography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  A. L. Finkelshtein,et al.  Calculation of x‐ray tube spectral distributions , 1999 .

[12]  O. Klein,et al.  Über die Streuung von Strahlung durch freie Elektronen nach der neuen relativistischen Quantendynamik von Dirac , 1929 .

[13]  L. Grodzins,et al.  Optimum energies for x-ray transmission tomography of small samples. Applications of synchrotron radiation to computerized tomography I , 1983 .

[14]  Sean M. Robinson,et al.  Non-invasive material discrimination using spectral x-ray radiography , 2014 .

[15]  John S. Hendricks,et al.  Features of MCNP6 , 2014, ICS 2014.

[16]  Ricardo Tadeu Lopes,et al.  Dual-energy computerized tomography in compacted soil , 2000 .

[17]  C. Crawford,et al.  Dual energy computed tomography for explosive detection , 2006 .

[18]  P. Rizo,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE MATRIX ATTENUATION IN HETEROGENEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DRUMS USING DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 1999 .

[19]  W D Brown,et al.  TP75-MicroCT Test Bed Data Acquisition for Multi-Energy Zeff and Rho-e Decomposition Analysis , 2013 .

[20]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Quantitative imaging of electron density and effective atomic number using phase contrast CT. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  A simple image based method for obtaining electron density and atomic number in dual energy CT , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[22]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Stephen G. Azevedo,et al.  Computerized tomography studies of concrete samples , 1991 .

[24]  Bernd Weissmuller,et al.  Radiological Imaging The Theory Of Image Formation Detection And Processing , 2016 .

[25]  J. Seco,et al.  Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[27]  P. Shikhaliev.  Energy-resolved computed tomography: first experimental results , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  W. Clem Karl,et al.  Artifact reduction in dual-energy CT reconstruction for security applications , 2014 .

[29]  Jong Kyung Kim,et al.  Calculation of Effective Atomic Number and Normal Density Using a Source Weighting Method in a Dual Energy X-ray Inspection System , 2011 .

[30]  Philip M Evans,et al.  Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube. Part I. electron penetration characteristics in x-ray targets. , 2007, Medical physics.

[31]  Martin Styner,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  J S Kallman,et al.  ZeCalc Algorithm Details , 2012 .

[33]  A. Vyas,et al.  X-ray attenuation coefficient of mixtures: inputs for dual-energy CT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[34]  J. D. Bernal,et al.  X-Rays in Theory and Experiment , 1935, Nature.

[35]  R D Franich,et al.  Robust calculation of effective atomic numbers: the Auto-Z(eff) software. , 2012, Medical physics.

[36]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[37]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  EPDL97: the evaluated photo data library `97 version , 1997 .