Recursive SAM-based band selection for hyperspectral anomaly detection

Band selection has been widely used in hyperspectral image processing for dimension reduction. In this paper, a recursive SAM-based band selection (RSAM-BBS) method is proposed. Once two initial bands are given, RSAM-BBS is performed in a sequential manner, and at each step the band that can best describe the spectral separation of two hyperspectral signatures is added to the bands already selected until the spectral angle reaches its maximum. In order to demonstrate the utility of the proposed band selection method, an anomaly detection algorithm is developed, which first extracts the anomalous target spectrum from the original image using automatic target detection and classification algorithm (ATDCA), followed by maximum spectral screening (MSS) to estimate the background average spectrum, then implements RSAM-BBS to select bands that participate in the subsequent adaptive cosine estimator (ACE) target detection. As shown in the experimental result on the AVIRIS dataset, less than five bands selected by the RSAM-BBS can achieve comparable detection performance using the full bands.

[1]  Stefan A. Robila,et al.  A Class of Detection Filters for Targets and Anomalies in Multispectral / Hyperspectral Imagery , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[2]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Automatic spectral target recognition in hyperspectral imagery , 2003 .

[3]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Variable-Number Variable-Band Selection for Feature Characterization in Hyperspectral Signatures , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A computer-aided detection and classification method for concealed targets in hyperspectral imagery , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[5]  Nirmal Keshava,et al.  Best bands selection for detection in hyperspectral processing , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[6]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained band selection for hyperspectral imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Qian Du,et al.  Band selection and its impact on target detection and classification in hyperspectral image analysis , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[9]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[11]  Qian Du,et al.  Similarity-Based Unsupervised Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Analysis , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  Chein-I. Chang,et al.  New Hyperspectral Discrimination Measure for Spectral Characterization , 2004 .

[13]  Aamir Shahzad,et al.  Band clustering and selection and decision fusion for target detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[14]  Harald van der Werff,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Reference Spectra on Synthetic SAM Classification Results , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Qian Du,et al.  A comparative study for orthogonal subspace projection and constrained energy minimization , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..